LMVYX vs. LGLIX

Last updated Jul 11, 2026

LMVYX (Lord Abbett Focused Small Cap Value Fund) and LGLIX (Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund) are both mutual funds - LMVYX is a Small Cap Value Equities fund managed by Lord Abbett, while LGLIX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Lord Abbett. Over the past 10 years, LMVYX returned 9.09%/yr vs 17.86%/yr for LGLIX. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LMVYX charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for LGLIX.

Performance

LMVYX vs. LGLIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Focused Small Cap Value Fund (LMVYX) and Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund (LGLIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LMVYX achieves a 17.12% return, which is significantly higher than LGLIX's 9.22% return. Over the past 10 years, LMVYX has underperformed LGLIX with an annualized return of 9.09%, while LGLIX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.86% annualized return.

LMVYX

• 1D: 1.62%
• 1M: 0.42%
• 6M: 11.51%
• YTD: 17.12%
• 1Y: 20.89%
• 3Y*: 11.19%
• 5Y*: 5.48%
• 10Y*: 9.09%

LGLIX

• 1D: 1.72%
• 1M: 3.20%
• 6M: 8.05%
• YTD: 9.22%
• 1Y: 18.68%
• 3Y*: 26.63%
• 5Y*: 9.36%
• 10Y*: 17.86%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LMVYX vs. LGLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LMVYX Lord Abbett Focused Small Cap Value Fund	17.12%	0.23%	10.43%	13.83%	-15.05%	27.60%	8.57%	20.63%	-9.57%	7.73%
LGLIX Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund	9.22%	16.49%	44.97%	33.29%	-38.73%	8.62%	77.55%	35.02%	-1.08%	31.64%

Correlation

The correlation between LMVYX and LGLIX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.52
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2011	0.62

The correlation between LMVYX and LGLIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.62 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LMVYX vs. LGLIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LMVYX

LMVYX Risk / Return Rank: 30
LMVYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
LMVYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
LMVYX Omega Ratio Rank: 27
LMVYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
LMVYX Martin Ratio Rank: 30

LGLIX

LGLIX Risk / Return Rank: 13
LGLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
LGLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
LGLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 14
LGLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
LGLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LMVYX vs. LGLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Focused Small Cap Value Fund (LMVYX) and Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund (LGLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LMVYX	LGLIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.13	0.74	+0.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.77	1.11	+0.66
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.14	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.76	0.80	+0.95
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.31	2.29	+3.01

LMVYX vs. LGLIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LMVYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is higher than the LGLIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMVYX and LGLIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LMVYX vs. LGLIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMVYX drawdown since its inception was -59.70%, which is greater than LGLIX's maximum drawdown of -45.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMVYX and LGLIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LMVYX	LGLIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.70%	-45.95%	-13.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.85%	-21.01%	+9.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.97%	-29.25%	+0.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.97%	-45.95%	+16.98%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-53.61%	-45.95%	-7.66%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.71%	-1.73%	+0.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.08%	-9.30%	+0.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.92%	7.35%	-3.43%

Volatility

LMVYX vs. LGLIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lord Abbett Focused Small Cap Value Fund (LMVYX) is 5.54%, while Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund (LGLIX) has a volatility of 9.23%. This indicates that LMVYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LGLIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LMVYX	LGLIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.54%	9.23%	-3.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.98%	18.14%	-5.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.35%	22.92%	-4.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.03%	26.20%	-4.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.30%	24.94%	+0.36%

LMVYX vs. LGLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LMVYX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than LGLIX's 0.64% expense ratio.

Dividends

LMVYX vs. LGLIX - Dividend Comparison

LMVYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.86%, more than LGLIX's 1.82% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LGLIX Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund	1.82%	1.99%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	23.83%	9.27%	8.01%	19.82%	6.46%	0.00%	4.84%
LMVYX Lord Abbett Focused Small Cap Value Fund	3.86%	4.52%	6.69%	0.24%	4.01%	10.49%	0.92%	16.57%	17.51%	19.53%	17.52%	2.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LMVYX and LGLIX in my portfolio?

LMVYX and LGLIX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LMVYX or LGLIX?

LGLIX has higher volatility (9.23%) compared to LMVYX (5.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LMVYX dropped -59.70% vs LGLIX's -45.95%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LMVYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.