LMUB vs. TAXI
LMUB (iShares Long-Term National Muni Bond ETF) and TAXI (Northern Trust Intermediate Tax-Exempt Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds - LMUB tracks the ICE AMT-Free US Long National Municipal Index while TAXI tracks the ICE Intermediate Term Focused Municipal Bond Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LMUB charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for TAXI.
Performance
LMUB vs. TAXI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LMUB achieves a 2.32% return, which is significantly higher than TAXI's 0.94% return.
LMUB
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.90%
- YTD
- 2.32%
- 6M
- 2.47%
- 1Y
- 9.37%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TAXI
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- YTD
- 0.94%
- 6M
- 1.55%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LMUB vs. TAXI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LMUB iShares Long-Term National Muni Bond ETF | 2.32% | 6.44% |
TAXI Northern Trust Intermediate Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 0.94% | 3.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between LMUB and TAXI is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025 | 0.57 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LMUB vs. TAXI — Risk / Return Rank
LMUB
TAXI
LMUB vs. TAXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Long-Term National Muni Bond ETF (LMUB) and Northern Trust Intermediate Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (TAXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LMUB | TAXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.02 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.61 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LMUB | TAXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.24 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 2.92 | -2.10 |
Drawdowns
LMUB vs. TAXI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LMUB drawdown since its inception was -5.51%, which is greater than TAXI's maximum drawdown of -2.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMUB and TAXI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LMUB | TAXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.51% | -2.23% | -3.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.79% | +0.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.61% | -0.46% | -1.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.89% | — | — |
Volatility
LMUB vs. TAXI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LMUB | TAXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.44% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.05% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.21% | 1.90% | +2.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.97% | 1.90% | +4.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.97% | 1.90% | +4.07% |
LMUB vs. TAXI - Expense Ratio Comparison
LMUB has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than TAXI's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LMUB vs. TAXI - Dividend Comparison
LMUB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.77%, more than TAXI's 2.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
LMUB iShares Long-Term National Muni Bond ETF | 3.77% | 3.14% |
TAXI Northern Trust Intermediate Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 2.00% | 0.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LMUB and TAXI have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TAXI is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TAXI is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for LMUB.
LMUB has the higher dividend yield at 3.77%, compared with 2.00% for TAXI.
LMUB tracks ICE AMT-Free US Long National Municipal Index, while TAXI tracks ICE Intermediate Term Focused Municipal Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for LMUB and 0.05% for TAXI.
Find the right allocation for LMUB and TAXI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer