LMTL vs. INTW
LMTL (Direxion Daily LMT Bull 2X ETF) and INTW (GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their -0.07 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. LMTL charges 1.07%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for INTW.
Performance
LMTL vs. INTW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LMTL achieves a 31.80% return, which is significantly lower than INTW's 259.86% return.
LMTL
- 1D
- 3.26%
- 1M
- 12.42%
- 6M
- -21.47%
- YTD
- 31.80%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
INTW
- 1D
- -2.27%
- 1M
- -47.68%
- 6M
- 152.57%
- YTD
- 259.86%
- 1Y
- 991.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 233.14%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $147.32M | $136.96M | $217.62M | |
| $1.74M | $1.09M | $1.04M |
LMTL vs. INTW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LMTL Direxion Daily LMT Bull 2X ETF | 31.80% | 20.96% |
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF | 259.86% | 176.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between LMTL and INTW is -0.07, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2025 | -0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LMTL vs. INTW — Risk / Return Rank
LMTL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
INTW
LMTL vs. INTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily LMT Bull 2X ETF (LMTL) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LMTL | INTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.49 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 13.60 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 36.74 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LMTL vs. INTW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LMTL drawdown since its inception was -49.46%, smaller than the maximum INTW drawdown of -69.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMTL and INTW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LMTL | INTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.46% | -69.16% | +19.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -69.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.83% | -62.96% | +32.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.06% | -30.60% | +12.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 25.56% | — |
Volatility
LMTL vs. INTW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LMTL | INTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 48.12% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 117.12% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.40% | 157.38% | -102.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.40% | 150.65% | -96.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.40% | 150.65% | -96.25% |
LMTL vs. INTW - Expense Ratio Comparison
LMTL has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than INTW's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
LMTL vs. INTW - Dividend Comparison
LMTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.46%, while INTW has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LMTL Direxion Daily LMT Bull 2X ETF | 3.46% | 3.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LMTL and INTW have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LMTL is cheaper at 1.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LMTL is cheaper with a 1.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for INTW.
LMTL has the higher dividend yield at 3.46%, compared with 0.00% for INTW.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for LMTL and 1.50% for INTW.
Find the right allocation for LMTL and INTW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer