LMTL vs. CRMG
LMTL (Direxion Daily LMT Bull 2X ETF) and CRMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. LMTL charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CRMG.
Performance
LMTL vs. CRMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LMTL achieves a 8.57% return, which is significantly higher than CRMG's -56.09% return.
LMTL
- 1D
- 2.29%
- 1M
- 4.14%
- YTD
- 8.57%
- 6M
- 25.50%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRMG
- 1D
- -1.95%
- 1M
- -1.95%
- YTD
- -56.09%
- 6M
- -50.25%
- 1Y
- -60.55%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LMTL vs. CRMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LMTL Direxion Daily LMT Bull 2X ETF | 8.57% | 20.61% |
CRMG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF | -56.09% | 3.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between LMTL and CRMG is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2025 | -0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LMTL vs. CRMG — Risk / Return Rank
LMTL
CRMG
LMTL vs. CRMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily LMT Bull 2X ETF (LMTL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LMTL | CRMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | -0.65 | +1.45 |
Drawdowns
LMTL vs. CRMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LMTL drawdown since its inception was -45.74%, smaller than the maximum CRMG drawdown of -74.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMTL and CRMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LMTL | CRMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.74% | -74.38% | +28.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -70.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.02% | -67.87% | +24.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.72% | -37.81% | +24.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 41.08% | — |
Volatility
LMTL vs. CRMG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LMTL | CRMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 34.03% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 63.87% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.78% | 75.31% | -26.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.78% | 75.62% | -26.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.78% | 75.62% | -26.84% |
LMTL vs. CRMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
LMTL has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than CRMG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
LMTL vs. CRMG - Dividend Comparison
LMTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%, while CRMG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CRMG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LMTL Direxion Daily LMT Bull 2X ETF | 3.47% | 3.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LMTL and CRMG have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CRMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CRMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for LMTL.
LMTL has the higher dividend yield at 3.47%, compared with 0.00% for CRMG.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for LMTL and 0.75% for CRMG.
Find the right allocation for LMTL and CRMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer