LMTL vs. DLLL
LMTL (Direxion Daily LMT Bull 2X ETF) and DLLL (GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. LMTL is actively managed, while DLLL is passively managed. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LMTL charges 1.07%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for DLLL.
Performance
LMTL vs. DLLL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LMTL achieves a 8.57% return, which is significantly lower than DLLL's 758.72% return.
LMTL
- 1D
- 2.29%
- 1M
- 4.14%
- YTD
- 8.57%
- 6M
- 25.50%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DLLL
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 230.95%
- YTD
- 758.72%
- 6M
- 593.50%
- 1Y
- 836.76%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LMTL vs. DLLL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LMTL Direxion Daily LMT Bull 2X ETF | 8.57% | 20.61% |
DLLL GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF | 758.72% | -13.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between LMTL and DLLL is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2025 | 0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LMTL vs. DLLL — Risk / Return Rank
LMTL
DLLL
LMTL vs. DLLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily LMT Bull 2X ETF (LMTL) and GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LMTL | DLLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 6.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 3.14 | -2.35 |
Drawdowns
LMTL vs. DLLL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LMTL drawdown since its inception was -45.74%, smaller than the maximum DLLL drawdown of -68.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMTL and DLLL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LMTL | DLLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.74% | -68.58% | +22.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -57.19% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.02% | -18.77% | -24.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.72% | -25.89% | +12.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 27.39% | — |
Volatility
LMTL vs. DLLL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LMTL | DLLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 69.62% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 102.01% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.78% | 129.16% | -80.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.78% | 130.36% | -81.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.78% | 130.36% | -81.58% |
LMTL vs. DLLL - Expense Ratio Comparison
LMTL has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than DLLL's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
LMTL vs. DLLL - Dividend Comparison
LMTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%, while DLLL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
DLLL GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LMTL Direxion Daily LMT Bull 2X ETF | 3.47% | 3.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LMTL and DLLL have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LMTL is cheaper at 1.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LMTL is cheaper with a 1.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DLLL.
LMTL has the higher dividend yield at 3.47%, compared with 0.00% for DLLL.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for LMTL and 1.50% for DLLL.
Find the right allocation for LMTL and DLLL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer