LMT vs. VUSB
LMT (Lockheed Martin Corporation) is a stock, while VUSB (Vanguard Ultra-Short Bond ETF) is Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Vanguard. Over the past 5 years, LMT returned 8.25%/yr vs 3.43%/yr for VUSB. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LMT vs. VUSB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LMT achieves a 7.12% return, which is significantly higher than VUSB's 1.39% return.
LMT
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -0.53%
- YTD
- 7.12%
- 6M
- 15.96%
- 1Y
- 9.51%
- 3Y*
- 6.88%
- 5Y*
- 8.25%
- 10Y*
- 10.81%
VUSB
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.40%
- YTD
- 1.39%
- 6M
- 1.76%
- 1Y
- 4.59%
- 3Y*
- 5.34%
- 5Y*
- 3.43%
- 10Y*
- —
LMT vs. VUSB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LMT Lockheed Martin Corporation | 7.12% | 2.47% | 10.02% | -4.31% | 40.48% | -4.42% |
VUSB Vanguard Ultra-Short Bond ETF | 1.39% | 5.20% | 5.68% | 5.52% | -0.36% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between LMT and VUSB is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2021 | 0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LMT vs. VUSB — Risk / Return Rank
LMT
VUSB
LMT vs. VUSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) and Vanguard Ultra-Short Bond ETF (VUSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LMT | VUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -6.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -12.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 3.44 | -2.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.38 | 12.43 | -12.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.93 | 71.97 | -71.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LMT | VUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 | 7.10 | -6.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 4.14 | -3.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 4.09 | -3.72 |
Drawdowns
LMT vs. VUSB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LMT drawdown since its inception was -79.29%, which is greater than VUSB's maximum drawdown of -1.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMT and VUSB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LMT | VUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.29% | -1.79% | -77.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.15% | -0.37% | -24.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.79% | -0.46% | -31.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.79% | -1.79% | -30.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.67% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.84% | -0.02% | -23.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.84% | -0.27% | -26.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.22% | 0.06% | +10.16% |
Volatility
LMT vs. VUSB - Volatility Comparison
Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) has a higher volatility of 5.45% compared to Vanguard Ultra-Short Bond ETF (VUSB) at 0.18%. This indicates that LMT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LMT | VUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.45% | 0.18% | +5.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.56% | 0.52% | +19.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.54% | 0.65% | +25.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.89% | 0.83% | +22.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.71% | 0.82% | +22.89% |
Dividends
LMT vs. VUSB - Dividend Comparison
LMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, less than VUSB's 4.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LMT Lockheed Martin Corporation | 2.67% | 2.76% | 2.62% | 2.68% | 2.34% | 2.98% | 2.76% | 2.31% | 3.13% | 2.32% | 2.71% | 2.83% |
VUSB Vanguard Ultra-Short Bond ETF | 4.39% | 4.63% | 5.16% | 4.45% | 1.56% | 0.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LMT and VUSB have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LMT has higher volatility (5.45%) compared to VUSB (0.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LMT dropped -79.29% vs VUSB's -1.79%.
VUSB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.10 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LMT and VUSB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer