PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LMT vs. VUSB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LMT vs. VUSB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) and Vanguard Ultra-Short Bond ETF (VUSB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LMT achieves a 7.12% return, which is significantly higher than VUSB's 1.39% return.


LMT

1D
-0.27%
1M
-0.53%
YTD
7.12%
6M
15.96%
1Y
9.51%
3Y*
6.88%
5Y*
8.25%
10Y*
10.81%

VUSB

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.40%
YTD
1.39%
6M
1.76%
1Y
4.59%
3Y*
5.34%
5Y*
3.43%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LMT vs. VUSB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
LMT
Lockheed Martin Corporation
7.12%2.47%10.02%-4.31%40.48%-4.42%
VUSB
Vanguard Ultra-Short Bond ETF
1.39%5.20%5.68%5.52%-0.36%0.00%

Correlation

The correlation between LMT and VUSB is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2021

0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LMT vs. VUSB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LMT
LMT Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
LMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMT Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
LMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMT Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

VUSB
VUSB Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
VUSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUSB Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
VUSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUSB Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LMT vs. VUSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) and Vanguard Ultra-Short Bond ETF (VUSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LMTVUSBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-6.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-12.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

3.44

-2.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.38

12.43

-12.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.93

71.97

-71.03

LMT vs. VUSB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LMT Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is lower than the VUSB Sharpe Ratio of 7.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMT and VUSB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LMTVUSBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

7.10

-6.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

4.14

-3.78

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

4.09

-3.72

Drawdowns

LMT vs. VUSB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMT drawdown since its inception was -79.29%, which is greater than VUSB's maximum drawdown of -1.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMT and VUSB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LMTVUSBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.29%

-1.79%

-77.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.15%

-0.37%

-24.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.79%

-0.46%

-31.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.79%

-1.79%

-30.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.84%

-0.02%

-23.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.84%

-0.27%

-26.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.22%

0.06%

+10.16%

Volatility

LMT vs. VUSB - Volatility Comparison

Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) has a higher volatility of 5.45% compared to Vanguard Ultra-Short Bond ETF (VUSB) at 0.18%. This indicates that LMT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LMTVUSBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.45%

0.18%

+5.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.56%

0.52%

+19.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.54%

0.65%

+25.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.89%

0.83%

+22.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.71%

0.82%

+22.89%

Dividends

LMT vs. VUSB - Dividend Comparison

LMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, less than VUSB's 4.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LMT
Lockheed Martin Corporation
2.67%2.76%2.62%2.68%2.34%2.98%2.76%2.31%3.13%2.32%2.71%2.83%
VUSB
Vanguard Ultra-Short Bond ETF
4.39%4.63%5.16%4.45%1.56%0.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LMT and VUSB have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LMT has higher volatility (5.45%) compared to VUSB (0.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LMT dropped -79.29% vs VUSB's -1.79%.

VUSB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.10 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LMT and VUSB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer