PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LMT vs. SKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LMT vs. SKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) and Skechers U.S.A., Inc. (SKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


LMT

1D
-1.52%
1M
5.40%
YTD
13.04%
6M
13.84%
1Y
14.07%
3Y*
8.98%
5Y*
9.78%
10Y*
11.37%

SKX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LMT vs. SKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LMT
Lockheed Martin Corporation
13.04%2.47%10.02%-4.31%40.48%3.15%-6.49%52.55%-16.35%31.77%
SKX
Skechers U.S.A., Inc.
0.00%-6.11%7.86%48.61%-3.34%20.76%-16.79%88.69%-39.51%53.95%

Correlation

The correlation between LMT and SKX is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 1999

0.20

The correlation between LMT and SKX shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LMT:

$124.87B

SKX:

$9.55B

EPS

LMT:

$20.61

SKX:

$4.40

PE Ratio

LMT:

26.21

SKX:

14.35

PS Ratio

LMT:

1.67

SKX:

1.01

PB Ratio

LMT:

16.67

SKX:

2.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

LMT:

$75.12B

SKX:

$9.41B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LMT:

$7.37B

SKX:

$4.96B

EBITDA (TTM)

LMT:

$8.09B

SKX:

$1.07B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LMT vs. SKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LMT
LMT Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
LMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMT Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
LMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMT Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

SKX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LMT vs. SKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) and Skechers U.S.A., Inc. (SKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LMTSKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.69

LMT vs. SKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LMT vs. SKX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LMTSKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.81%

Volatility

LMT vs. SKX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LMTSKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.76%

Dividends

LMT vs. SKX - Dividend Comparison

LMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, while SKX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LMT
Lockheed Martin Corporation
2.53%2.76%2.62%2.68%2.34%2.98%2.76%2.31%3.13%2.32%2.71%2.83%
SKX
Skechers U.S.A., Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

LMT vs. SKX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lockheed Martin Corporation and Skechers U.S.A., Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
18.02B
2.44B
(LMT) Total Revenue
(SKX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LMT vs. SKX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lockheed Martin Corporation and Skechers U.S.A., Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
11.5%
53.3%
Portfolio components
LMT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.08B and revenue of 18.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.5%.

SKX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Skechers U.S.A., Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.30B and revenue of 2.44B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.3%.

LMT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported an operating income of 2.06B and revenue of 18.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.5%.

SKX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Skechers U.S.A., Inc. reported an operating income of 173.08M and revenue of 2.44B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.1%.

LMT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported a net income of 1.49B and revenue of 18.02B, resulting in a net margin of 8.3%.

SKX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Skechers U.S.A., Inc. reported a net income of 170.50M and revenue of 2.44B, resulting in a net margin of 7.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LMT and SKX have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LMT and SKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer