LMT vs. FXF

Last updated Jul 25, 2026

LMT (Lockheed Martin Corporation) is a stock, while FXF (Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust) is Currency fund tracking the Swiss Franc. Over the past 10 years, LMT returned 11.54%/yr vs 1.08%/yr for FXF. Their -0.00 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past.

Performance

LMT vs. FXF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) and Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust (FXF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LMT achieves a 21.88% return, which is significantly higher than FXF's -3.50% return. Over the past 10 years, LMT has outperformed FXF with an annualized return of 11.54%, while FXF has yielded a comparatively lower 1.08% annualized return.

LMT

• 1D: 2.46%
• 1M: 15.36%
• 6M: -0.22%
• YTD: 21.88%
• 1Y: 42.06%
• 3Y*: 11.61%
• 5Y*: 11.85%
• 10Y*: 11.54%
• ALL TIME*: 12.38%

FXF

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: -1.09%
• 6M: -4.81%
• YTD: -3.50%
• 1Y: -3.38%
• 3Y*: 1.52%
• 5Y*: 1.83%
• 10Y*: 1.08%
• ALL TIME*: 1.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FXF Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust	$2.99M	$3.23M	$5.41M
LMT Lockheed Martin Corporation	$682.65M	$676.87M	$688.00M

LMT vs. FXF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LMT Lockheed Martin Corporation	21.88%	2.47%	10.02%	-4.31%	40.48%	3.15%	-6.49%	52.55%	-16.35%	31.77%
FXF Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust	-3.50%	14.04%	-7.46%	9.63%	-2.29%	-4.08%	8.18%	0.32%	-2.01%	3.31%

Correlation

The correlation between LMT and FXF is 0.13, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.13
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.08
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.07
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2006	-0.00

The correlation between LMT and FXF shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (all time) to 0.13 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LMT vs. FXF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LMT

LMT Risk / Return Rank: 81
LMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
LMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
LMT Omega Ratio Rank: 84
LMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
LMT Martin Ratio Rank: 74

FXF

FXF Risk / Return Rank: 6
FXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
FXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
FXF Omega Ratio Rank: 6
FXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
FXF Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LMT vs. FXF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) and Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust (FXF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LMT	FXF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.57	-0.47	+2.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.36	-0.64	+3.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	0.93	+0.35
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.58	-0.48	+2.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.38	-1.15	+4.53

LMT vs. FXF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LMT Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is higher than the FXF Sharpe Ratio of -0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMT and FXF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LMT vs. FXF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMT drawdown since its inception was -79.29%, which is greater than FXF's maximum drawdown of -35.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMT and FXF.

Drawdown Indicators

	LMT	FXF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-79.29%	-35.58%	-43.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.87%	-7.15%	-19.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-31.79%	-8.52%	-23.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.79%	-11.99%	-19.80%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.67%	-15.04%	-21.63%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.34%	-21.23%	+7.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.82%	-20.83%	-5.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.54%	2.98%	+9.56%

Volatility

LMT vs. FXF - Volatility Comparison

Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) has a higher volatility of 12.24% compared to Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust (FXF) at 1.75%. This indicates that LMT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FXF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LMT	FXF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.24%	1.75%	+10.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.08%	5.46%	+16.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.06%	7.39%	+19.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.79%	8.31%	+15.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.18%	7.57%	+16.61%

Dividends

LMT vs. FXF - Dividend Comparison

LMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%, while FXF has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FXF Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust	0.00%	0.00%	0.03%	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LMT Lockheed Martin Corporation	2.34%	2.76%	2.62%	2.68%	2.34%	2.98%	2.76%	2.31%	3.13%	2.32%	2.71%	2.83%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LMT and FXF in my portfolio?

LMT and FXF have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LMT or FXF?

LMT has higher volatility (12.24%) compared to FXF (1.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LMT dropped -79.29% vs FXF's -35.58%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.