LMSIX vs. SSLCX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LMSIX (Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund) and SSLCX (DWS Small Cap Core Fund) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, LMSIX returned 11.23%/yr vs 10.93%/yr for SSLCX. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. LMSIX charges 1.03%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SSLCX.

Performance

LMSIX vs. SSLCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund (LMSIX) and DWS Small Cap Core Fund (SSLCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LMSIX achieves a 16.18% return, which is significantly higher than SSLCX's 12.74% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LMSIX having a 11.23% annualized return and SSLCX not far behind at 10.93%.

LMSIX

• 1D: 1.17%
• 1M: 3.36%
• YTD: 16.18%
• 6M: 15.04%
• 1Y: 41.69%
• 3Y*: 21.49%
• 5Y*: 9.34%
• 10Y*: 11.23%

SSLCX

• 1D: 1.08%
• 1M: 1.97%
• YTD: 12.74%
• 6M: 12.70%
• 1Y: 18.16%
• 3Y*: 13.71%
• 5Y*: 6.36%
• 10Y*: 10.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LMSIX vs. SSLCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LMSIX Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund	16.18%	20.19%	9.90%	18.80%	-15.16%	29.12%	11.29%	20.75%	-15.61%	8.81%
SSLCX DWS Small Cap Core Fund	12.74%	4.99%	9.85%	13.09%	-13.53%	41.16%	14.65%	21.72%	-14.28%	11.63%

Correlation

The correlation between LMSIX and SSLCX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2001	0.96

The correlation between LMSIX and SSLCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LMSIX vs. SSLCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LMSIX

LMSIX Risk / Return Rank: 72
LMSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
LMSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
LMSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 54
LMSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
LMSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

SSLCX

SSLCX Risk / Return Rank: 24
SSLCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
SSLCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
SSLCX Omega Ratio Rank: 20
SSLCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
SSLCX Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LMSIX vs. SSLCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund (LMSIX) and DWS Small Cap Core Fund (SSLCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LMSIX	SSLCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.39	1.30	+1.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.31	1.87	+1.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.23	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.76	2.12	+2.65
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.58	6.69	+9.89
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LMSIX vs. SSLCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LMSIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is higher than the SSLCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMSIX and SSLCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LMSIX	SSLCX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.39	1.30	+1.09
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43	0.37	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48	0.52	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.34	0.39	-0.05

Drawdowns

LMSIX vs. SSLCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMSIX drawdown since its inception was -61.16%, roughly equal to the maximum SSLCX drawdown of -63.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMSIX and SSLCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LMSIX	SSLCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.16%	-63.14%	+1.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.22%	-8.78%	-0.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.80%	-17.34%	-9.46%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.66%	-22.57%	-5.09%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-50.26%	-48.07%	-2.19%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.89%	-11.31%	+0.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.64%	2.77%	-0.13%

Volatility

LMSIX vs. SSLCX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund (LMSIX) has a higher volatility of 5.31% compared to DWS Small Cap Core Fund (SSLCX) at 4.08%. This indicates that LMSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSLCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LMSIX	SSLCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.31%	4.08%	+1.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.90%	10.00%	+2.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.36%	14.28%	+4.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.95%	17.37%	+4.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.50%	21.05%	+2.45%

LMSIX vs. SSLCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LMSIX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than SSLCX's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

LMSIX vs. SSLCX - Dividend Comparison

LMSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.46%, more than SSLCX's 1.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LMSIX Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund	5.46%	6.35%	4.05%	3.70%	5.18%	21.64%	3.60%	1.48%	11.17%	8.85%	4.79%	7.52%
SSLCX DWS Small Cap Core Fund	1.07%	1.21%	1.52%	0.68%	1.07%	1.67%	0.35%	0.16%	5.99%	5.78%	0.60%	8.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LMSIX and SSLCX in my portfolio?

LMSIX and SSLCX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LMSIX or SSLCX?

LMSIX has higher volatility (5.31%) compared to SSLCX (4.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LMSIX dropped -61.16% vs SSLCX's -63.14%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LMSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.