LMSIX vs. FKGRX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

LMSIX (Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund) and FKGRX (Franklin Growth Fund Class A) are both mutual funds - LMSIX is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Franklin Templeton, while FKGRX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton. Over the past 10 years, LMSIX returned 11.14%/yr vs 13.46%/yr for FKGRX. Their correlation of 0.83 means they have usually moved in the same direction. LMSIX charges 1.03%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for FKGRX.

Performance

LMSIX vs. FKGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund (LMSIX) and Franklin Growth Fund Class A (FKGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LMSIX achieves a 19.73% return, which is significantly higher than FKGRX's 4.81% return. Over the past 10 years, LMSIX has underperformed FKGRX with an annualized return of 11.14%, while FKGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.46% annualized return.

LMSIX

• 1D: 1.15%
• 1M: -0.16%
• 6M: 14.39%
• YTD: 19.73%
• 1Y: 40.26%
• 3Y*: 18.86%
• 5Y*: 11.07%
• 10Y*: 11.14%
• ALL TIME*: 8.13%

FKGRX

• 1D: 1.66%
• 1M: -0.91%
• 6M: 3.50%
• YTD: 4.81%
• 1Y: 11.92%
• 3Y*: 14.41%
• 5Y*: 7.53%
• 10Y*: 13.46%
• ALL TIME*: 11.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FKGRX Franklin Growth Fund Class A	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
LMSIX Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

LMSIX vs. FKGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LMSIX Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund	19.73%	20.19%	9.90%	18.80%	-15.16%	29.12%	11.29%	20.75%	-15.61%	8.81%
FKGRX Franklin Growth Fund Class A	4.81%	15.38%	17.96%	27.54%	-25.32%	21.61%	30.71%	32.08%	-3.37%	26.31%

Correlation

The correlation between LMSIX and FKGRX is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.77
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.76
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.79
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2000	0.83

The correlation between LMSIX and FKGRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LMSIX vs. FKGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LMSIX

LMSIX Risk / Return Rank: 86
LMSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
LMSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
LMSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 76
LMSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
LMSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

FKGRX

FKGRX Risk / Return Rank: 20
FKGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
FKGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
FKGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 19
FKGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
FKGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LMSIX vs. FKGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund (LMSIX) and Franklin Growth Fund Class A (FKGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LMSIX	FKGRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.00	0.71	+1.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.84	1.06	+1.78
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.13	+0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.06	0.86	+3.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.06	3.32	+10.75

LMSIX vs. FKGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LMSIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is higher than the FKGRX Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMSIX and FKGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LMSIX vs. FKGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMSIX drawdown since its inception was -61.16%, which is greater than FKGRX's maximum drawdown of -51.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMSIX and FKGRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LMSIX	FKGRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.16%	-51.08%	-10.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.22%	-11.48%	+2.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.80%	-21.72%	-5.08%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.66%	-32.22%	+4.56%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-50.26%	-32.52%	-17.74%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.29%	-2.41%	+1.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.82%	-6.72%	-4.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.66%	2.96%	-0.30%

Volatility

LMSIX vs. FKGRX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund (LMSIX) has a higher volatility of 3.88% compared to Franklin Growth Fund Class A (FKGRX) at 3.41%. This indicates that LMSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FKGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LMSIX	FKGRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.88%	3.41%	+0.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.52%	10.82%	+2.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.70%	13.89%	+4.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.87%	19.69%	+2.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.45%	19.54%	+3.91%

LMSIX vs. FKGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LMSIX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than FKGRX's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

LMSIX vs. FKGRX - Dividend Comparison

LMSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.73%, less than FKGRX's 13.71% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FKGRX Franklin Growth Fund Class A	13.71%	14.37%	8.34%	6.26%	10.49%	9.19%	7.97%	5.75%	1.65%	2.38%	3.26%	3.88%
LMSIX Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund	6.73%	6.35%	4.05%	3.70%	5.18%	21.64%	3.60%	1.48%	11.17%	8.85%	4.79%	7.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LMSIX and FKGRX in my portfolio?

LMSIX and FKGRX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LMSIX or FKGRX?

LMSIX has higher volatility (3.88%) compared to FKGRX (3.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LMSIX dropped -61.16% vs FKGRX's -51.08%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LMSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.