LMP.L vs. SMFG
LMP.L (LondonMetric Property plc) and SMFG (Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.) are both stocks. LMP.L operates in REIT - Diversified (Real Estate), while SMFG operates in Banks - Diversified (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, LMP.L returned 7.29%/yr vs 19.43%/yr for SMFG. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LMP.L vs. SMFG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LMP.L is traded in GBp, while SMFG is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SMFG values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LMP.L achieves a 3.47% return, which is significantly lower than SMFG's 24.82% return. Over the past 10 years, LMP.L has underperformed SMFG with an annualized return of 7.29%, while SMFG has yielded a comparatively higher 19.43% annualized return.
LMP.L
- 1D
- -0.94%
- 1M
- 1.87%
- YTD
- 3.47%
- 6M
- 4.29%
- 1Y
- -0.91%
- 3Y*
- 11.26%
- 5Y*
- 1.42%
- 10Y*
- 7.29%
SMFG
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- 9.68%
- YTD
- 24.82%
- 6M
- 23.65%
- 1Y
- 64.51%
- 3Y*
- 42.32%
- 5Y*
- 32.78%
- 10Y*
- 19.43%
LMP.L vs. SMFG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LMP.L LondonMetric Property plc | 3.47% | 12.48% | -0.43% | 17.21% | -36.54% | 28.33% | 0.54% | 41.57% | -2.30% | 25.29% |
SMFG Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. | 24.82% | 28.18% | 57.61% | 19.35% | 36.17% | 11.09% | -13.61% | 14.93% | -17.60% | 7.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between LMP.L and SMFG is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2013 | 0.12 |
Fundamentals
LMP.L:
£4.42B
SMFG:
$149.44B
LMP.L:
£0.28
SMFG:
¥539.55
LMP.L:
6.70
SMFG:
7.11
LMP.L:
0.23
SMFG:
0.57
LMP.L:
4.97
SMFG:
1.16
LMP.L:
0.94
SMFG:
1.52
LMP.L:
£867.40M
SMFG:
¥15.42T
LMP.L:
£854.10M
SMFG:
¥8.35T
LMP.L:
£828.60M
SMFG:
¥3.54T
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LMP.L vs. SMFG — Risk / Return Rank
LMP.L
SMFG
LMP.L vs. SMFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LondonMetric Property plc (LMP.L) and Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. (SMFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LMP.L | SMFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.39 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.06 | 3.60 | -3.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.11 | 10.25 | -10.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LMP.L vs. SMFG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LMP.L drawdown since its inception was -42.13%, smaller than the maximum SMFG drawdown of -61.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMP.L and SMFG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LMP.L | SMFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.13% | -61.91% | +19.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.39% | -18.02% | +2.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.22% | -24.73% | +8.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.56% | -24.73% | -16.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.13% | -40.01% | -2.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.35% | -6.24% | -8.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.18% | -25.41% | +15.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.08% | 6.31% | +1.77% |
Volatility
LMP.L vs. SMFG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for LondonMetric Property plc (LMP.L) is 5.80%, while Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. (SMFG) has a volatility of 8.75%. This indicates that LMP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMFG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LMP.L | SMFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.80% | 8.75% | -2.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.90% | 20.48% | -5.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.16% | 27.43% | -9.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.61% | 27.71% | -3.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.65% | 26.28% | -2.63% |
Dividends
LMP.L vs. SMFG - Dividend Comparison
LMP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.56%, more than SMFG's 1.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LMP.L LondonMetric Property plc | 6.56% | 6.54% | 6.16% | 5.07% | 5.48% | 3.12% | 3.71% | 3.55% | 4.60% | 4.09% | 4.73% | 3.35% |
SMFG Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. | 1.26% | 2.84% | 2.82% | 3.67% | 2.12% | 0.00% | 5.97% | 4.61% | 4.80% | 3.17% | 3.63% | 3.32% |
Financials
LMP.L vs. SMFG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LondonMetric Property plc and Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LMP.L vs. SMFG - Profitability Comparison
LMP.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LondonMetric Property plc reported a gross profit of 233.80M and revenue of 238.90M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 97.9%.
SMFG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.37T and revenue of 2.51T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.6%.
LMP.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LondonMetric Property plc reported an operating income of 217.10M and revenue of 238.90M, resulting in an operating margin of 90.9%.
SMFG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 364.07B and revenue of 2.51T, resulting in an operating margin of 14.5%.
LMP.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LondonMetric Property plc reported a net income of 165.40M and revenue of 238.90M, resulting in a net margin of 69.2%.
SMFG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. reported a net income of 191.66B and revenue of 2.51T, resulting in a net margin of 7.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LMP.L and SMFG have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for LMP.L and SMFG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer