PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LMP.L vs. ATH.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LMP.L vs. ATH.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in LondonMetric Property plc (LMP.L) and Athabasca Oil Corporation (ATH.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LMP.L is traded in GBp, while ATH.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the ATH.TO values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LMP.L achieves a 3.47% return, which is significantly lower than ATH.TO's 42.36% return. Over the past 10 years, LMP.L has underperformed ATH.TO with an annualized return of 7.29%, while ATH.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 20.62% annualized return.


LMP.L

1D
-0.94%
1M
1.87%
YTD
3.47%
6M
4.29%
1Y
-0.91%
3Y*
11.26%
5Y*
1.42%
10Y*
7.29%

ATH.TO

1D
-0.14%
1M
-7.80%
YTD
42.36%
6M
42.91%
1Y
80.91%
3Y*
47.05%
5Y*
56.83%
10Y*
20.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LMP.L vs. ATH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LMP.L
LondonMetric Property plc
3.47%12.48%-0.43%17.21%-36.54%28.33%0.54%41.57%-2.30%25.29%
ATH.TO
Athabasca Oil Corporation
42.36%28.36%19.90%68.39%113.10%606.98%-71.35%-40.21%-9.59%-48.86%

Correlation

The correlation between LMP.L and ATH.TO is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2013

0.04

The correlation between LMP.L and ATH.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LMP.L:

£4.42B

ATH.TO:

CA$4.95B

EPS

LMP.L:

£0.28

ATH.TO:

CA$0.45

PE Ratio

LMP.L:

6.70

ATH.TO:

22.82

PEG Ratio

LMP.L:

0.23

ATH.TO:

0.87

PS Ratio

LMP.L:

4.97

ATH.TO:

3.71

PB Ratio

LMP.L:

0.94

ATH.TO:

2.68

Total Revenue (TTM)

LMP.L:

£867.40M

ATH.TO:

CA$1.35B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LMP.L:

£854.10M

ATH.TO:

CA$518.18M

EBITDA (TTM)

LMP.L:

£828.60M

ATH.TO:

CA$505.02M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LMP.L vs. ATH.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LMP.L
LMP.L Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
LMP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
LMP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

ATH.TO
ATH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
ATH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
ATH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LMP.L vs. ATH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LondonMetric Property plc (LMP.L) and Athabasca Oil Corporation (ATH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LMP.LATH.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.34

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.06

3.73

-3.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.11

11.51

-11.62

LMP.L vs. ATH.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LMP.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.05, which is lower than the ATH.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMP.L and ATH.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LMP.L vs. ATH.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMP.L drawdown since its inception was -42.13%, smaller than the maximum ATH.TO drawdown of -99.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMP.L and ATH.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LMP.LATH.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.13%

-99.47%

+57.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.39%

-21.79%

+6.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.22%

-30.17%

+13.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.56%

-40.99%

-0.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.13%

-94.97%

+52.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.35%

-53.86%

+39.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.18%

-74.96%

+64.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.08%

7.05%

+1.03%

Volatility

LMP.L vs. ATH.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for LondonMetric Property plc (LMP.L) is 5.80%, while Athabasca Oil Corporation (ATH.TO) has a volatility of 12.76%. This indicates that LMP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ATH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LMP.LATH.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.80%

12.76%

-6.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.90%

32.56%

-17.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.16%

38.63%

-20.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.61%

49.47%

-24.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.65%

61.68%

-38.03%

Dividends

LMP.L vs. ATH.TO - Dividend Comparison

LMP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.56%, while ATH.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ATH.TO
Athabasca Oil Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LMP.L
LondonMetric Property plc
6.56%6.54%6.16%5.07%5.48%3.12%3.71%3.55%4.60%4.09%4.73%3.35%

Financials

LMP.L vs. ATH.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LondonMetric Property plc and Athabasca Oil Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M20222023202420252026
238.90M
377.38M
(LMP.L) Total Revenue
(ATH.TO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. LMP.L values in GBP, ATH.TO values in CAD

LMP.L vs. ATH.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between LondonMetric Property plc and Athabasca Oil Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
97.9%
35.8%
Portfolio components
LMP.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LondonMetric Property plc reported a gross profit of 233.80M and revenue of 238.90M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 97.9%.

ATH.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Athabasca Oil Corporation reported a gross profit of 134.91M and revenue of 377.38M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.8%.

LMP.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LondonMetric Property plc reported an operating income of 217.10M and revenue of 238.90M, resulting in an operating margin of 90.9%.

ATH.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Athabasca Oil Corporation reported an operating income of 90.74M and revenue of 377.38M, resulting in an operating margin of 24.0%.

LMP.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LondonMetric Property plc reported a net income of 165.40M and revenue of 238.90M, resulting in a net margin of 69.2%.

ATH.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Athabasca Oil Corporation reported a net income of 46.29M and revenue of 377.38M, resulting in a net margin of 12.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LMP.L and ATH.TO have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LMP.L and ATH.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer