PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LMOPX vs. BIGTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LMOPX vs. BIGTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Miller Opportunity Trust (LMOPX) and The Texas Fund (BIGTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LMOPX achieves a 6.75% return, which is significantly lower than BIGTX's 20.99% return. Over the past 10 years, LMOPX has outperformed BIGTX with an annualized return of 13.95%, while BIGTX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.64% annualized return.


LMOPX

1D
0.49%
1M
0.35%
YTD
6.75%
6M
4.54%
1Y
32.16%
3Y*
25.22%
5Y*
2.92%
10Y*
13.95%

BIGTX

1D
-0.11%
1M
-1.43%
YTD
20.99%
6M
18.84%
1Y
28.66%
3Y*
19.68%
5Y*
8.43%
10Y*
10.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LMOPX vs. BIGTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LMOPX
Miller Opportunity Trust
6.75%26.41%25.40%38.10%-36.67%-3.97%37.56%32.94%-10.47%25.00%
BIGTX
The Texas Fund
20.99%5.98%15.76%11.32%-6.93%23.90%13.11%9.61%-11.44%11.58%

Correlation

The correlation between LMOPX and BIGTX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014

0.79

The correlation between LMOPX and BIGTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.79 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LMOPX vs. BIGTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LMOPX
LMOPX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
LMOPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMOPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMOPX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
LMOPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMOPX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

BIGTX
BIGTX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
BIGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
BIGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LMOPX vs. BIGTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Miller Opportunity Trust (LMOPX) and The Texas Fund (BIGTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LMOPXBIGTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.32

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

3.43

-1.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.81

11.78

-4.97

LMOPX vs. BIGTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LMOPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the BIGTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMOPX and BIGTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LMOPX vs. BIGTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMOPX drawdown since its inception was -81.54%, roughly equal to the maximum BIGTX drawdown of -77.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMOPX and BIGTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LMOPXBIGTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.54%

-77.89%

-3.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.96%

-8.07%

-7.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.19%

-77.89%

+48.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.35%

-77.89%

+25.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.03%

-77.89%

+24.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.73%

-66.37%

+64.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.13%

-17.39%

-3.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.57%

2.34%

+2.23%

Volatility

LMOPX vs. BIGTX - Volatility Comparison

Miller Opportunity Trust (LMOPX) has a higher volatility of 6.94% compared to The Texas Fund (BIGTX) at 5.35%. This indicates that LMOPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIGTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LMOPXBIGTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.94%

5.35%

+1.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.73%

10.80%

+4.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.30%

14.54%

+6.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.22%

126.73%

-98.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.78%

90.66%

-61.88%

LMOPX vs. BIGTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LMOPX has a 1.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BIGTX's 1.67% expense ratio.


Dividends

LMOPX vs. BIGTX - Dividend Comparison

LMOPX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BIGTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.10%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BIGTX
The Texas Fund
6.10%7.38%3.52%2.51%3.06%5.27%0.07%0.08%2.27%
LMOPX
Miller Opportunity Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%14.45%1.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LMOPX and BIGTX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LMOPX has higher volatility (6.94%) compared to BIGTX (5.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LMOPX dropped -81.54% vs BIGTX's -77.89%.

BIGTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LMOPX and BIGTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer