LMNX vs. COTG
LMNX (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long LMND ETF) and COTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. LMNX charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for COTG.
Performance
LMNX vs. COTG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LMNX achieves a -62.00% return, which is significantly lower than COTG's 17.32% return.
LMNX
- 1D
- -17.92%
- 1M
- -12.57%
- YTD
- -62.00%
- 6M
- -66.00%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COTG
- 1D
- 1.39%
- 1M
- -11.21%
- YTD
- 17.32%
- 6M
- 1.51%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LMNX vs. COTG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LMNX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long LMND ETF | -62.00% | 82.13% |
COTG Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF | 17.32% | -15.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between LMNX and COTG is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2025 | -0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LMNX vs. COTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long LMND ETF (LMNX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LMNX | COTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.26 | -0.28 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
LMNX vs. COTG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LMNX drawdown since its inception was -78.77%, which is greater than COTG's maximum drawdown of -25.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMNX and COTG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LMNX | COTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.77% | -25.69% | -53.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -78.22% | -23.48% | -54.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.90% | -8.35% | -32.55% |
Volatility
LMNX vs. COTG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LMNX | COTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 173.88% | 40.65% | +133.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 173.88% | 40.65% | +133.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 173.88% | 40.65% | +133.23% |
LMNX vs. COTG - Expense Ratio Comparison
LMNX has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than COTG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
LMNX vs. COTG - Dividend Comparison
Neither LMNX nor COTG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LMNX and COTG have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, COTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
COTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for LMNX.
LMNX and COTG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance ETFs and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for LMNX and 0.75% for COTG.
Find the right allocation for LMNX and COTG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer