PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LMNR vs. CHSCO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LMNR vs. CHSCO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Limoneira Company (LMNR) and CHS Inc. (CHSCO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with LMNR having a 2.73% return and CHSCO slightly higher at 2.79%. Over the past 10 years, LMNR has underperformed CHSCO with an annualized return of -1.66%, while CHSCO has yielded a comparatively higher 5.82% annualized return.


LMNR

1D
-2.26%
1M
-1.89%
6M
-9.93%
YTD
2.73%
1Y
-11.21%
3Y*
-5.12%
5Y*
-4.67%
10Y*
-1.66%
ALL TIME*
6.03%

CHSCO

1D
0.31%
1M
-0.43%
6M
1.97%
YTD
2.79%
1Y
3.80%
3Y*
6.93%
5Y*
5.27%
10Y*
5.82%
ALL TIME*
7.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$631.25K$496.82K$653.67K
$916.42K$878.37K$1.23M

LMNR vs. CHSCO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LMNR
Limoneira Company
2.73%-47.35%20.18%72.03%-16.74%-8.26%-11.60%-0.15%-11.71%5.20%
CHSCO
CHS Inc.
2.79%3.38%9.77%11.68%-3.25%5.89%13.50%13.86%-4.34%9.08%

Correlation

The correlation between LMNR and CHSCO is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2013

0.10

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LMNR:

$235.17M

CHSCO:

$311.57M

Total Revenue (TTM)

LMNR:

$132.43M

CHSCO:

$37.41B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LMNR:

-$8.21M

CHSCO:

$1.14B

EBITDA (TTM)

LMNR:

-$40.13M

CHSCO:

$1.03B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LMNR vs. CHSCO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LMNR
LMNR Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
LMNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMNR Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
LMNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMNR Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

CHSCO
CHSCO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
CHSCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHSCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHSCO Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
CHSCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHSCO Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LMNR vs. CHSCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Limoneira Company (LMNR) and CHS Inc. (CHSCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LMNRCHSCODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.12

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.39

1.41

-1.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.67

2.99

-3.65

LMNR vs. CHSCO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LMNR Sharpe Ratio is -0.37, which is lower than the CHSCO Sharpe Ratio of 0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMNR and CHSCO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LMNR vs. CHSCO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMNR drawdown since its inception was -66.40%, which is greater than CHSCO's maximum drawdown of -29.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMNR and CHSCO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LMNRCHSCODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.40%

-29.21%

-37.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.60%

-2.67%

-24.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.13%

-4.87%

-53.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.13%

-9.16%

-48.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.82%

-29.21%

-36.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-55.39%

-1.49%

-53.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.78%

-2.21%

-31.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.05%

1.26%

+14.79%

Volatility

LMNR vs. CHSCO - Volatility Comparison

Limoneira Company (LMNR) has a higher volatility of 8.68% compared to CHS Inc. (CHSCO) at 0.93%. This indicates that LMNR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CHSCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LMNRCHSCODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.68%

0.93%

+7.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.97%

3.97%

+17.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.14%

5.83%

+23.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.04%

9.09%

+26.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.12%

13.17%

+25.95%

Dividends

LMNR vs. CHSCO - Dividend Comparison

LMNR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, less than CHSCO's 7.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CHSCO
CHS Inc.
7.65%7.58%7.28%7.42%7.70%6.92%6.84%7.23%7.66%6.83%6.97%6.84%
LMNR
Limoneira Company
1.16%2.38%1.23%1.45%2.46%2.00%1.80%1.56%1.34%1.02%0.95%1.24%

Financials

LMNR vs. CHSCO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Limoneira Company and CHS Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

LMNR vs. CHSCO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Limoneira Company and CHS Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

LMNR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Limoneira Company reported a gross profit of -243.00K and revenue of 23.93M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -1.0%.

CHSCO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CHS Inc. reported a gross profit of 410.62M and revenue of 11.58B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 3.6%.

LMNR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Limoneira Company reported an operating income of -4.55M and revenue of 23.93M, resulting in an operating margin of -19.0%.

CHSCO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CHS Inc. reported an operating income of 108.34M and revenue of 11.58B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.9%.

LMNR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Limoneira Company reported a net income of -21.42M and revenue of 23.93M, resulting in a net margin of -89.5%.

CHSCO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CHS Inc. reported a net income of 267.37M and revenue of 11.58B, resulting in a net margin of 2.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LMNR and CHSCO have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LMNR has higher volatility (8.68%) compared to CHSCO (0.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LMNR dropped -66.40% vs CHSCO's -29.21%.

CHSCO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.65 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LMNR and CHSCO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer