CHSCO vs. CTVA
CHSCO (CHS Inc.) and CTVA (Corteva, Inc.) are both stocks. CHSCO operates in Farm Products (Consumer Defensive), while CTVA operates in Agricultural Inputs (Basic Materials). Over the past 5 years, CHSCO returned 5.68%/yr vs 13.49%/yr for CTVA. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CHSCO vs. CTVA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHSCO achieves a 3.11% return, which is significantly lower than CTVA's 18.56% return.
CHSCO
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 3.11%
- 6M
- 3.91%
- 1Y
- 5.70%
- 3Y*
- 7.68%
- 5Y*
- 5.68%
- 10Y*
- 6.37%
CTVA
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- -0.34%
- YTD
- 18.56%
- 6M
- 18.35%
- 1Y
- 7.30%
- 3Y*
- 12.63%
- 5Y*
- 13.49%
- 10Y*
- —
CHSCO vs. CTVA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHSCO CHS Inc. | 3.11% | 3.38% | 9.77% | 11.68% | -3.25% | 5.89% | 13.50% | 3.89% |
CTVA Corteva, Inc. | 18.56% | 18.89% | 20.24% | -17.51% | 25.58% | 23.55% | 33.49% | 0.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHSCO and CTVA is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2019 | 0.14 |
The correlation between CHSCO and CTVA shifts across timeframes, from 0.00 (1 year) to 0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CHSCO:
$35.59B
CTVA:
$17.89B
CHSCO:
$1.06B
CTVA:
$6.00B
CHSCO:
$1.12B
CTVA:
$2.68B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHSCO vs. CTVA — Risk / Return Rank
CHSCO
CTVA
CHSCO vs. CTVA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CHS Inc. (CHSCO) and Corteva, Inc. (CTVA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CHSCO | CTVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.08 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.15 | 0.35 | +1.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.83 | 0.75 | +4.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CHSCO vs. CTVA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHSCO drawdown since its inception was -29.21%, smaller than the maximum CTVA drawdown of -34.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHSCO and CTVA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHSCO | CTVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.21% | -34.76% | +5.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.67% | -20.71% | +18.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.87% | -24.69% | +19.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.16% | -34.76% | +25.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.21% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.19% | -7.22% | +6.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.21% | -10.53% | +8.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.19% | 9.71% | -8.52% |
Volatility
CHSCO vs. CTVA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CHS Inc. (CHSCO) is 2.18%, while Corteva, Inc. (CTVA) has a volatility of 5.13%. This indicates that CHSCO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTVA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHSCO | CTVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.18% | 5.13% | -2.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.18% | 15.44% | -11.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.01% | 23.26% | -17.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.12% | 26.91% | -17.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.21% | 32.61% | -19.40% |
Dividends
CHSCO vs. CTVA - Dividend Comparison
CHSCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.63%, more than CTVA's 0.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHSCO CHS Inc. | 7.63% | 7.58% | 7.28% | 7.42% | 7.70% | 6.92% | 6.84% | 7.23% | 7.66% | 6.83% | 6.97% | 6.84% |
CTVA Corteva, Inc. | 0.91% | 1.04% | 1.16% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.14% | 1.34% | 0.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
CHSCO vs. CTVA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CHS Inc. and Corteva, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CHSCO vs. CTVA - Profitability Comparison
CHSCO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CHS Inc. reported a gross profit of 25.82M and revenue of 8.35B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.3%.
CTVA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Corteva, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.91B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
CHSCO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CHS Inc. reported an operating income of -241.79M and revenue of 8.35B, resulting in an operating margin of -2.9%.
CTVA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Corteva, Inc. reported an operating income of 725.00M and revenue of 4.91B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.8%.
CHSCO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CHS Inc. reported a net income of -147.05M and revenue of 8.35B, resulting in a net margin of -1.8%.
CTVA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Corteva, Inc. reported a net income of 720.00M and revenue of 4.91B, resulting in a net margin of 14.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CHSCO and CTVA have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CTVA has higher volatility (5.13%) compared to CHSCO (2.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHSCO dropped -29.21% vs CTVA's -34.76%.
CHSCO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs 0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CHSCO and CTVA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer