PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CHSCO vs. CHSCP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CHSCO vs. CHSCP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CHS Inc. (CHSCO) and CHS Inc. (CHSCP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHSCO achieves a 2.87% return, which is significantly higher than CHSCP's 1.24% return. Over the past 10 years, CHSCO has outperformed CHSCP with an annualized return of 6.33%, while CHSCP has yielded a comparatively lower 5.05% annualized return.


CHSCO

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.27%
YTD
2.87%
6M
3.51%
1Y
4.74%
3Y*
6.96%
5Y*
5.43%
10Y*
6.33%

CHSCP

1D
-0.54%
1M
-0.22%
YTD
1.24%
6M
4.02%
1Y
7.91%
3Y*
4.25%
5Y*
4.91%
10Y*
5.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHSCO vs. CHSCP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CHSCO
CHS Inc.
2.87%3.38%9.77%11.68%-3.25%5.89%13.50%13.86%-4.34%9.08%
CHSCP
CHS Inc.
1.24%5.36%-2.63%17.86%-3.07%10.34%14.39%12.12%-4.85%9.82%

Correlation

The correlation between CHSCO and CHSCP is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2013

0.39

The correlation between CHSCO and CHSCP shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (1 year) to 0.40 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM)

CHSCO:

$35.59B

CHSCP:

$35.59B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CHSCO:

$1.06B

CHSCP:

$1.06B

EBITDA (TTM)

CHSCO:

$1.12B

CHSCP:

$1.12B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CHSCO vs. CHSCP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHSCO
CHSCO Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
CHSCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHSCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHSCO Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
CHSCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHSCO Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

CHSCP
CHSCP Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
CHSCP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHSCP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHSCP Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
CHSCP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHSCP Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHSCO vs. CHSCP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CHS Inc. (CHSCO) and CHS Inc. (CHSCP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CHSCOCHSCPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.82

0.83

-0.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.17

1.28

-0.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.16

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.37

0.91

+0.46

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.28

2.05

+1.24

CHSCO vs. CHSCP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHSCO Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is comparable to the CHSCP Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHSCO and CHSCP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CHSCOCHSCPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

0.83

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.39

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.39

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.61

-0.03

Drawdowns

CHSCO vs. CHSCP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHSCO drawdown since its inception was -29.21%, which is greater than CHSCP's maximum drawdown of -16.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHSCO and CHSCP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CHSCOCHSCPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.21%

-16.06%

-13.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.12%

-8.97%

+5.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.87%

-14.26%

+9.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.16%

-15.08%

+5.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.21%

-15.44%

-13.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.64%

-4.95%

+4.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.22%

-3.10%

+0.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.30%

4.00%

-2.70%

Volatility

CHSCO vs. CHSCP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CHS Inc. (CHSCO) is 1.27%, while CHS Inc. (CHSCP) has a volatility of 2.09%. This indicates that CHSCO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHSCP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CHSCOCHSCPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.27%

2.09%

-0.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.81%

6.93%

-3.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.81%

9.57%

-3.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.10%

12.76%

-3.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.19%

12.97%

+0.22%

Dividends

CHSCO vs. CHSCP - Dividend Comparison

CHSCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.51%, more than CHSCP's 7.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CHSCO
CHS Inc.
7.51%7.58%7.28%7.42%7.70%6.92%6.84%7.23%7.66%6.83%6.97%6.84%
CHSCP
CHS Inc.
7.26%7.22%7.09%6.46%7.13%6.47%6.69%7.14%7.47%6.64%6.83%6.46%

Financials

CHSCO vs. CHSCP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CHS Inc. and CHS Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


8.00B9.00B10.00B11.00B12.00B13.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
8.35B
8.35B
(CHSCO) Total Revenue
(CHSCP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CHSCO vs. CHSCP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CHS Inc. and CHS Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%2.0%4.0%6.0%8.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
0.3%
0.3%
Portfolio components
CHSCO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CHS Inc. reported a gross profit of 25.82M and revenue of 8.35B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.3%.

CHSCP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CHS Inc. reported a gross profit of 25.82M and revenue of 8.35B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.3%.

CHSCO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CHS Inc. reported an operating income of -241.79M and revenue of 8.35B, resulting in an operating margin of -2.9%.

CHSCP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CHS Inc. reported an operating income of -241.79M and revenue of 8.35B, resulting in an operating margin of -2.9%.

CHSCO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CHS Inc. reported a net income of -147.05M and revenue of 8.35B, resulting in a net margin of -1.8%.

CHSCP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CHS Inc. reported a net income of -147.05M and revenue of 8.35B, resulting in a net margin of -1.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CHSCO and CHSCP have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CHSCP has higher volatility (2.09%) compared to CHSCO (1.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHSCO dropped -29.21% vs CHSCP's -16.06%.

CHSCP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.83 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CHSCO and CHSCP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer