LMLCX vs. VICBX
LMLCX (Western Asset SMASh Series C Fund) and VICBX (Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares) are both Corporate Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, LMLCX returned 4.61%/yr vs 3.19%/yr for VICBX. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LMLCX charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VICBX.
Performance
LMLCX vs. VICBX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LMLCX achieves a 1.37% return, which is significantly higher than VICBX's 0.17% return. Over the past 10 years, LMLCX has outperformed VICBX with an annualized return of 4.61%, while VICBX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.19% annualized return.
LMLCX
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- 0.84%
- YTD
- 1.37%
- 6M
- 1.43%
- 1Y
- 9.54%
- 3Y*
- 6.34%
- 5Y*
- 4.46%
- 10Y*
- 4.61%
VICBX
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- YTD
- 0.17%
- 6M
- 0.32%
- 1Y
- 5.58%
- 3Y*
- 6.18%
- 5Y*
- 1.29%
- 10Y*
- 3.19%
LMLCX vs. VICBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LMLCX Western Asset SMASh Series C Fund | 1.37% | 12.22% | -2.21% | 12.93% | -3.51% | 3.08% | 2.93% | 15.10% | -4.24% | 7.20% |
VICBX Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares | 0.17% | 9.37% | 3.67% | 8.87% | -14.06% | -1.50% | 9.57% | 15.96% | -1.72% | 5.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between LMLCX and VICBX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2012 | 0.49 |
Over the past year, LMLCX and VICBX have become more correlated (0.94) than their long-term average of 0.49, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LMLCX vs. VICBX — Risk / Return Rank
LMLCX
VICBX
LMLCX vs. VICBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Western Asset SMASh Series C Fund (LMLCX) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares (VICBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LMLCX | VICBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.28 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.57 | 2.10 | +0.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.79 | 7.01 | +1.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LMLCX | VICBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.57 | 1.58 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.21 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 0.60 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 0.88 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
LMLCX vs. VICBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LMLCX drawdown since its inception was -23.45%, which is greater than VICBX's maximum drawdown of -20.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMLCX and VICBX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LMLCX | VICBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.45% | -20.55% | -2.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.22% | -2.95% | -1.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.77% | -5.98% | -5.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.77% | -20.55% | +8.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.45% | -20.55% | -2.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.44% | -1.35% | +0.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.94% | -3.14% | +1.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.23% | 0.88% | +0.35% |
Volatility
LMLCX vs. VICBX - Volatility Comparison
Western Asset SMASh Series C Fund (LMLCX) has a higher volatility of 2.03% compared to Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares (VICBX) at 1.37%. This indicates that LMLCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VICBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LMLCX | VICBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.03% | 1.37% | +0.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.46% | 2.87% | +1.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.91% | 3.91% | +3.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.79% | 6.16% | +1.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.19% | 5.34% | +1.85% |
LMLCX vs. VICBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LMLCX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than VICBX's 0.05% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LMLCX vs. VICBX - Dividend Comparison
LMLCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.21%, more than VICBX's 4.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LMLCX Western Asset SMASh Series C Fund | 6.21% | 6.11% | 6.58% | 5.78% | 4.46% | 5.42% | 3.54% | 4.16% | 5.59% | 4.04% | 3.75% | 5.64% |
VICBX Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares | 4.80% | 4.61% | 4.79% | 3.72% | 3.02% | 2.82% | 2.79% | 5.01% | 3.64% | 3.23% | 3.32% | 3.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, LMLCX and VICBX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
LMLCX has higher volatility (2.03%) compared to VICBX (1.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LMLCX dropped -23.45% vs VICBX's -20.55%.
VICBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LMLCX and VICBX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer