PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LMIYX vs. LGLIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LMIYX vs. LGLIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Micro Cap Growth Fund (LMIYX) and Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund (LGLIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LMIYX achieves a 25.96% return, which is significantly higher than LGLIX's 10.47% return. Over the past 10 years, LMIYX has outperformed LGLIX with an annualized return of 21.06%, while LGLIX has yielded a comparatively lower 18.20% annualized return.


LMIYX

1D
-0.62%
1M
7.18%
YTD
25.96%
6M
23.91%
1Y
51.53%
3Y*
19.40%
5Y*
10.65%
10Y*
21.06%

LGLIX

1D
0.13%
1M
6.80%
YTD
10.47%
6M
9.03%
1Y
26.45%
3Y*
28.69%
5Y*
11.55%
10Y*
18.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LMIYX vs. LGLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LMIYX
Lord Abbett Micro Cap Growth Fund
25.96%11.02%27.28%6.14%-29.10%32.54%79.45%34.34%2.19%38.54%
LGLIX
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund
10.47%16.49%44.97%33.29%-38.73%8.62%77.55%35.02%-1.08%31.64%

Correlation

The correlation between LMIYX and LGLIX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2011

0.81

The correlation between LMIYX and LGLIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LMIYX vs. LGLIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LMIYX
LMIYX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
LMIYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMIYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMIYX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
LMIYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMIYX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

LGLIX
LGLIX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
LGLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
LGLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LMIYX vs. LGLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Micro Cap Growth Fund (LMIYX) and Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund (LGLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LMIYXLGLIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.23

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.49

1.30

+3.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.59

3.76

+11.83

LMIYX vs. LGLIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LMIYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is higher than the LGLIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMIYX and LGLIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LMIYXLGLIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.03

1.30

+0.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.45

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.74

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.70

-0.21

Drawdowns

LMIYX vs. LGLIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMIYX drawdown since its inception was -61.35%, which is greater than LGLIX's maximum drawdown of -45.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMIYX and LGLIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LMIYXLGLIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.35%

-45.95%

-15.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.80%

-21.01%

+9.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.16%

-29.25%

-1.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.86%

-45.95%

+3.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.37%

-45.95%

+2.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.61%

0.00%

-1.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.31%

-9.34%

-8.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.39%

7.27%

-3.88%

Volatility

LMIYX vs. LGLIX - Volatility Comparison

Lord Abbett Micro Cap Growth Fund (LMIYX) has a higher volatility of 9.16% compared to Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund (LGLIX) at 5.23%. This indicates that LMIYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LGLIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LMIYXLGLIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.16%

5.23%

+3.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.58%

15.72%

+4.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.05%

21.07%

+4.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.17%

25.84%

+4.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.03%

24.79%

+4.24%

LMIYX vs. LGLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LMIYX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than LGLIX's 0.64% expense ratio.


Dividends

LMIYX vs. LGLIX - Dividend Comparison

LMIYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than LGLIX's 1.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LGLIX
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund
1.80%1.99%0.00%0.00%0.00%23.83%9.27%8.01%19.82%6.46%0.00%4.84%
LMIYX
Lord Abbett Micro Cap Growth Fund
0.01%0.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%22.32%23.16%15.30%37.13%15.17%0.00%21.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


LMIYX and LGLIX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LMIYX has higher volatility (9.16%) compared to LGLIX (5.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LMIYX dropped -61.35% vs LGLIX's -45.95%.

LMIYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LMIYX and LGLIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer