LMGTX vs. TBGVX
Compare and contrast key facts about ClearBridge International Growth Fund (LMGTX) and Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund (TBGVX).
LMGTX is managed by Legg Mason. It was launched on Apr 16, 1995. TBGVX is managed by Tweedy, Browne. It was launched on Jun 14, 1993.
Performance
LMGTX vs. TBGVX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LMGTX vs. TBGVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LMGTX ClearBridge International Growth Fund | -4.31% | 21.83% | 6.39% | 13.17% | -21.97% | 2.93% | 23.55% | 30.01% | -10.28% | 35.09% |
TBGVX Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund | 3.44% | 23.86% | 2.47% | 12.48% | -7.52% | 15.62% | -1.00% | 14.64% | -6.72% | 15.03% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LMGTX achieves a -4.31% return, which is significantly lower than TBGVX's 3.44% return. Over the past 10 years, LMGTX has outperformed TBGVX with an annualized return of 8.22%, while TBGVX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.70% annualized return.
LMGTX
- 1D
- 3.49%
- 1M
- -8.18%
- YTD
- -4.31%
- 6M
- -4.42%
- 1Y
- 11.28%
- 3Y*
- 8.44%
- 5Y*
- 2.73%
- 10Y*
- 8.22%
TBGVX
- 1D
- 1.78%
- 1M
- -6.84%
- YTD
- 3.44%
- 6M
- 7.64%
- 1Y
- 19.21%
- 3Y*
- 11.46%
- 5Y*
- 7.94%
- 10Y*
- 7.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LMGTX vs. TBGVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LMGTX has a 1.80% expense ratio, which is higher than TBGVX's 1.40% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LMGTX vs. TBGVX — Risk / Return Rank
LMGTX
TBGVX
LMGTX vs. TBGVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge International Growth Fund (LMGTX) and Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund (TBGVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LMGTX | TBGVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.62 | 1.58 | -0.97 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.96 | 2.13 | -1.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.34 | -0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.79 | 1.74 | -0.95 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.12 | 6.58 | -3.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LMGTX | TBGVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 | 1.58 | -0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 | 0.72 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.61 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.73 | -0.41 |
Correlation
The correlation between LMGTX and TBGVX is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
LMGTX vs. TBGVX - Dividend Comparison
LMGTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.16%, less than TBGVX's 11.71% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LMGTX ClearBridge International Growth Fund | 8.16% | 7.81% | 0.54% | 0.48% | 0.07% | 2.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TBGVX Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund | 11.71% | 12.11% | 9.95% | 4.55% | 5.68% | 8.89% | 0.94% | 1.88% | 6.74% | 1.10% | 3.16% | 4.94% |
Drawdowns
LMGTX vs. TBGVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LMGTX drawdown since its inception was -71.47%, which is greater than TBGVX's maximum drawdown of -50.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMGTX and TBGVX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LMGTX | TBGVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.47% | -50.97% | -20.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.71% | -9.56% | -4.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.65% | -17.71% | -17.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.65% | -31.18% | -4.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.54% | -7.46% | -3.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.56% | -6.09% | -10.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.48% | 2.66% | +0.82% |
Volatility
LMGTX vs. TBGVX - Volatility Comparison
ClearBridge International Growth Fund (LMGTX) has a higher volatility of 9.24% compared to Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund (TBGVX) at 4.70%. This indicates that LMGTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TBGVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LMGTX | TBGVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.24% | 4.70% | +4.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.24% | 7.39% | +5.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.88% | 12.36% | +6.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.47% | 11.03% | +6.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.20% | 12.64% | +4.56% |