PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LMGEX vs. LMLCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LMGEX vs. LMLCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin International Equity Fund (LMGEX) and Western Asset SMASh Series C Fund (LMLCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LMGEX achieves a 9.43% return, which is significantly higher than LMLCX's 2.13% return. Over the past 10 years, LMGEX has outperformed LMLCX with an annualized return of 8.29%, while LMLCX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.66% annualized return.


LMGEX

1D
0.49%
1M
2.89%
YTD
9.43%
6M
9.64%
1Y
23.22%
3Y*
16.45%
5Y*
9.42%
10Y*
8.29%

LMLCX

1D
0.33%
1M
1.77%
YTD
2.13%
6M
2.36%
1Y
10.00%
3Y*
6.32%
5Y*
4.48%
10Y*
4.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LMGEX vs. LMLCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LMGEX
Franklin International Equity Fund
9.43%32.05%3.42%18.48%-13.55%12.87%2.74%17.61%-16.67%23.58%
LMLCX
Western Asset SMASh Series C Fund
2.13%12.22%-2.21%12.93%-3.51%3.08%2.93%15.10%-4.24%7.20%

Correlation

The correlation between LMGEX and LMLCX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2012

0.39

The correlation between LMGEX and LMLCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (all time) to 0.54 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LMGEX vs. LMLCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LMGEX
LMGEX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
LMGEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMGEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMGEX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
LMGEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMGEX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

LMLCX
LMLCX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
LMLCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMLCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMLCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
LMLCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMLCX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LMGEX vs. LMLCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin International Equity Fund (LMGEX) and Western Asset SMASh Series C Fund (LMLCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LMGEXLMLCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.28

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

2.44

-0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.74

8.37

-1.64

LMGEX vs. LMLCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LMGEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is comparable to the LMLCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMGEX and LMLCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LMGEX vs. LMLCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMGEX drawdown since its inception was -63.37%, which is greater than LMLCX's maximum drawdown of -23.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMGEX and LMLCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LMGEXLMLCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.37%

-23.45%

-39.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.64%

-4.22%

-7.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.05%

-11.77%

-1.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.98%

-11.77%

-17.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.79%

-23.45%

-16.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

0.00%

-0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.19%

-1.94%

-16.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.28%

1.23%

+2.05%

Volatility

LMGEX vs. LMLCX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin International Equity Fund (LMGEX) has a higher volatility of 4.88% compared to Western Asset SMASh Series C Fund (LMLCX) at 1.88%. This indicates that LMGEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LMLCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LMGEXLMLCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.88%

1.88%

+3.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.88%

4.63%

+8.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.55%

6.72%

+8.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.89%

7.82%

+8.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.19%

7.20%

+8.99%

LMGEX vs. LMLCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LMGEX has a 2.05% expense ratio, which is higher than LMLCX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

LMGEX vs. LMLCX - Dividend Comparison

LMGEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.57%, more than LMLCX's 6.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LMGEX
Franklin International Equity Fund
7.57%8.28%5.68%1.51%2.88%5.10%0.58%0.49%1.62%1.60%1.30%0.91%
LMLCX
Western Asset SMASh Series C Fund
6.18%6.11%6.58%5.78%4.46%5.42%3.54%4.16%5.59%4.04%3.75%5.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


LMGEX and LMLCX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LMGEX has higher volatility (4.88%) compared to LMLCX (1.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LMGEX dropped -63.37% vs LMLCX's -23.45%.

LMLCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LMGEX and LMLCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer