LMGAX vs. LGLIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities Fund (LMGAX) and Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund (LGLIX).
LMGAX is managed by Lord Abbett. It was launched on Aug 1, 1995. LGLIX is managed by Lord Abbett. It was launched on Jun 30, 2011.
Performance
LMGAX vs. LGLIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LMGAX vs. LGLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LMGAX Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities Fund | -3.19% | 13.38% | 30.74% | 10.80% | -32.59% | 6.76% | 40.17% | 36.75% | -3.35% | 22.94% |
LGLIX Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund | -10.26% | 16.49% | 44.97% | 33.29% | -38.73% | 8.62% | 77.55% | 35.02% | -1.08% | 31.64% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LMGAX achieves a -3.19% return, which is significantly higher than LGLIX's -10.26% return. Over the past 10 years, LMGAX has underperformed LGLIX with an annualized return of 10.32%, while LGLIX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.86% annualized return.
LMGAX
- 1D
- 5.09%
- 1M
- -5.28%
- YTD
- -3.19%
- 6M
- -9.39%
- 1Y
- 26.08%
- 3Y*
- 14.19%
- 5Y*
- 2.66%
- 10Y*
- 10.32%
LGLIX
- 1D
- 5.01%
- 1M
- -5.07%
- YTD
- -10.26%
- 6M
- -13.13%
- 1Y
- 19.70%
- 3Y*
- 22.45%
- 5Y*
- 6.47%
- 10Y*
- 15.86%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LMGAX vs. LGLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LMGAX has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than LGLIX's 0.64% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LMGAX vs. LGLIX — Risk / Return Rank
LMGAX
LGLIX
LMGAX vs. LGLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities Fund (LMGAX) and Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund (LGLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LMGAX | LGLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.96 | 0.78 | +0.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.46 | 1.24 | +0.22 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.17 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.66 | 0.96 | +0.70 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.73 | 2.94 | +1.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LMGAX | LGLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 | 0.78 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 0.25 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 0.64 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.64 | -0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between LMGAX and LGLIX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
LMGAX vs. LGLIX - Dividend Comparison
LMGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.84%, more than LGLIX's 2.22% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LMGAX Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities Fund | 7.84% | 7.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 18.94% | 15.52% | 5.62% | 6.14% | 9.04% | 3.22% | 13.75% |
LGLIX Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund | 2.22% | 1.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 23.83% | 9.27% | 8.01% | 19.82% | 6.46% | 0.00% | 4.84% |
Drawdowns
LMGAX vs. LGLIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LMGAX drawdown since its inception was -49.96%, which is greater than LGLIX's maximum drawdown of -45.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMGAX and LGLIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LMGAX | LGLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.96% | -45.95% | -4.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.99% | -21.01% | +5.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.72% | -45.95% | +3.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.72% | -45.95% | +3.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.72% | -17.06% | +5.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.84% | -9.38% | -3.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.61% | 6.88% | -1.27% |
Volatility
LMGAX vs. LGLIX - Volatility Comparison
Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities Fund (LMGAX) has a higher volatility of 10.69% compared to Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund (LGLIX) at 9.60%. This indicates that LMGAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LGLIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LMGAX | LGLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.69% | 9.60% | +1.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.59% | 17.16% | +1.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.65% | 27.05% | +1.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.75% | 25.87% | -0.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.54% | 24.70% | -1.16% |