PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LMBS vs. BNO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LMBS vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Low Duration Mortgage Opportunities ETF (LMBS) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LMBS achieves a 1.39% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 77.90% return. Over the past 10 years, LMBS has underperformed BNO with an annualized return of 2.59%, while BNO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.06% annualized return.


LMBS

1D
-0.08%
1M
-0.15%
6M
0.68%
YTD
1.39%
1Y
4.45%
3Y*
5.75%
5Y*
3.07%
10Y*
2.59%
ALL TIME*
2.97%

BNO

1D
1.45%
1M
27.00%
6M
52.90%
YTD
77.90%
1Y
62.83%
3Y*
20.31%
5Y*
20.89%
10Y*
15.06%
ALL TIME*
4.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$107.13M$97.34M$147.52M
$21.63M$26.61M$25.51M

LMBS vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LMBS
First Trust Low Duration Mortgage Opportunities ETF
1.39%7.05%5.15%6.10%-3.07%-0.91%1.64%4.10%1.62%1.68%
BNO
United States Brent Oil Fund LP
77.90%-5.44%9.67%-3.43%35.25%62.34%-38.23%36.01%-15.30%15.43%

Correlation

The correlation between LMBS and BNO is -0.32, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

-0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

-0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2014

-0.10

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between LMBS and BNO has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.10 to -0.32, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LMBS vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LMBS
LMBS Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
LMBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMBS Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
LMBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMBS Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

BNO
BNO Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LMBS vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Low Duration Mortgage Opportunities ETF (LMBS) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LMBSBNODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.24

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.41

1.70

+1.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.82

5.15

+8.67

LMBS vs. BNO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LMBS Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is higher than the BNO Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMBS and BNO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LMBS vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMBS drawdown since its inception was -6.49%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMBS and BNO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LMBSBNODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.49%

-87.06%

+80.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.43%

-34.46%

+33.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.72%

-34.46%

+32.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.99%

-34.46%

+28.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.49%

-75.18%

+68.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.36%

-16.21%

+15.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.80%

-39.99%

+39.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.35%

11.86%

-11.51%

Volatility

LMBS vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Low Duration Mortgage Opportunities ETF (LMBS) is 0.73%, while United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) has a volatility of 17.47%. This indicates that LMBS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LMBSBNODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.73%

17.47%

-16.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.54%

40.96%

-39.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.97%

44.54%

-42.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.58%

36.41%

-33.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.35%

36.98%

-34.63%

LMBS vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

LMBS has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

LMBS vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

LMBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BNO
United States Brent Oil Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LMBS
First Trust Low Duration Mortgage Opportunities ETF
4.12%4.08%4.28%3.96%2.22%2.04%2.27%2.55%2.76%2.73%2.84%3.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


LMBS and BNO have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BNO has higher volatility (17.47%) compared to LMBS (0.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LMBS dropped -6.49% vs BNO's -87.06%.

On 10-year performance, BNO leads with 15.06% vs 2.59% for LMBS. On fees, LMBS is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, LMBS has been the lower-risk option at 0.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, BNO has performed better with a 15.06% return vs 2.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LMBS is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for BNO.

LMBS has the higher dividend yield at 4.12%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.

LMBS is categorized as Mortgage Backed Securities, while BNO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for LMBS and 1.00% for BNO.

LMBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LMBS and BNO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer