PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LLYX vs. XDSQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LLYX vs. XDSQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Long LLY ETF (LLYX) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LLYX achieves a -9.81% return, which is significantly lower than XDSQ's 2.80% return.


LLYX

1D
3.19%
1M
23.54%
YTD
-9.81%
6M
-3.59%
1Y
58.74%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XDSQ

1D
0.01%
1M
1.59%
YTD
2.80%
6M
3.86%
1Y
15.98%
3Y*
15.02%
5Y*
9.80%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LLYX vs. XDSQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
LLYX
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long LLY ETF
-9.81%44.29%-23.40%
XDSQ
Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF
2.80%14.22%12.64%

Correlation

The correlation between LLYX and XDSQ is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2024

0.29

The correlation between LLYX and XDSQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LLYX vs. XDSQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LLYX
LLYX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
LLYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LLYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
LLYX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
LLYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
LLYX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

XDSQ
XDSQ Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
XDSQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDSQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDSQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
XDSQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDSQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LLYX vs. XDSQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long LLY ETF (LLYX) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LLYXXDSQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.32

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.25

1.67

-0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.68

7.97

-5.30

LLYX vs. XDSQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LLYX Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is lower than the XDSQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LLYX and XDSQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LLYXXDSQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

1.52

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.00

0.69

-0.69

Drawdowns

LLYX vs. XDSQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LLYX drawdown since its inception was -67.98%, which is greater than XDSQ's maximum drawdown of -26.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LLYX and XDSQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LLYXXDSQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.98%

-26.06%

-41.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.36%

-9.60%

-37.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.95%

0.00%

-21.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.60%

-4.96%

-28.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.00%

2.01%

+19.99%

Volatility

LLYX vs. XDSQ - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Daily Target 2X Long LLY ETF (LLYX) has a higher volatility of 18.20% compared to Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ) at 0.57%. This indicates that LLYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDSQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LLYXXDSQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.20%

0.57%

+17.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

52.69%

8.40%

+44.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

74.98%

10.56%

+64.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

76.29%

15.27%

+61.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

76.29%

15.10%

+61.19%

LLYX vs. XDSQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

LLYX has a 1.32% expense ratio, which is higher than XDSQ's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

LLYX vs. XDSQ - Dividend Comparison

LLYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, while XDSQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


LLYX and XDSQ have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LLYX has higher volatility (18.20%) compared to XDSQ (0.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LLYX dropped -67.98% vs XDSQ's -26.06%.

On 1-year performance, LLYX leads with 58.74% vs 15.98% for XDSQ. On fees, XDSQ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XDSQ has been the lower-risk option at 0.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, LLYX has performed better with a 58.74% return vs 15.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XDSQ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.32% for LLYX.

LLYX has the higher dividend yield at 3.06%, compared with 0.00% for XDSQ.

They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.32% for LLYX and 0.79% for XDSQ.

XDSQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LLYX and XDSQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer