PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LLY vs. BTAL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LLY vs. BTAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) and AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LLY achieves a 5.78% return, which is significantly higher than BTAL's -20.15% return. Over the past 10 years, LLY has outperformed BTAL with an annualized return of 33.45%, while BTAL has yielded a comparatively lower -5.05% annualized return.


LLY

1D
-2.41%
1M
11.74%
YTD
5.78%
6M
10.64%
1Y
40.51%
3Y*
37.45%
5Y*
39.59%
10Y*
33.45%

BTAL

1D
-0.09%
1M
-4.33%
YTD
-20.15%
6M
-19.27%
1Y
-36.60%
3Y*
-12.17%
5Y*
-4.94%
10Y*
-5.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LLY vs. BTAL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LLY
Eli Lilly and Company
5.78%40.25%33.30%60.91%34.26%66.08%31.04%16.14%40.45%17.83%
BTAL
AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund
-20.15%-20.17%12.83%-15.11%20.48%-6.81%-13.86%1.07%15.13%-2.13%

Correlation

The correlation between LLY and BTAL is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2011

-0.11

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LLY vs. BTAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LLY
LLY Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
LLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
LLY Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
LLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
LLY Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

BTAL
BTAL Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
BTAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTAL Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
BTAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTAL Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LLY vs. BTAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) and AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LLYBTALDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

0.73

+0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.72

-0.98

+2.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.28

-1.64

+5.92

LLY vs. BTAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LLY Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is higher than the BTAL Sharpe Ratio of -1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LLY and BTAL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LLY vs. BTAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LLY drawdown since its inception was -68.24%, which is greater than BTAL's maximum drawdown of -50.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LLY and BTAL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LLYBTALDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.24%

-50.28%

-17.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.64%

-37.50%

+13.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.48%

-45.16%

+10.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.48%

-45.16%

+10.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.48%

-50.28%

+15.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.41%

-50.23%

+47.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.21%

-22.01%

+2.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.49%

22.38%

-12.89%

Volatility

LLY vs. BTAL - Volatility Comparison

Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) has a higher volatility of 9.27% compared to AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL) at 8.74%. This indicates that LLY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LLYBTALDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.27%

8.74%

+0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.16%

16.58%

+10.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.01%

22.49%

+15.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.46%

18.96%

+13.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.19%

17.33%

+12.86%

Dividends

LLY vs. BTAL - Dividend Comparison

LLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, less than BTAL's 3.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BTAL
AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund
3.11%2.49%3.49%6.14%1.01%0.00%0.00%0.88%0.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LLY
Eli Lilly and Company
0.57%0.56%0.67%0.78%1.07%1.23%1.75%1.96%1.94%2.46%2.77%2.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


LLY and BTAL have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LLY has higher volatility (9.27%) compared to BTAL (8.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LLY dropped -68.24% vs BTAL's -50.28%.

LLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs -1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LLY and BTAL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer