LLY vs. ^GSPC
LLY (Eli Lilly and Company) is a stock, while ^GSPC (S&P 500 Index) is an index. Over the past 10 years, LLY returned 33.45%/yr vs 13.61%/yr for ^GSPC. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LLY vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LLY achieves a 5.78% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 8.56% return. Over the past 10 years, LLY has outperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 33.45%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively lower 13.61% annualized return.
LLY
- 1D
- -2.41%
- 1M
- 11.74%
- YTD
- 5.78%
- 6M
- 10.64%
- 1Y
- 40.51%
- 3Y*
- 37.45%
- 5Y*
- 39.59%
- 10Y*
- 33.45%
^GSPC
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- -0.17%
- YTD
- 8.56%
- 6M
- 8.85%
- 1Y
- 22.93%
- 3Y*
- 19.37%
- 5Y*
- 11.84%
- 10Y*
- 13.61%
LLY vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LLY Eli Lilly and Company | 5.78% | 40.25% | 33.30% | 60.91% | 34.26% | 66.08% | 31.04% | 16.14% | 40.45% | 17.83% |
^GSPC S&P 500 Index | 8.56% | 16.39% | 23.31% | 24.23% | -19.44% | 26.89% | 16.26% | 28.88% | -6.24% | 19.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between LLY and ^GSPC is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 1978 | 0.48 |
Over the past year, the correlation between LLY and ^GSPC has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.48, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LLY vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank
LLY
^GSPC
LLY vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LLY | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.34 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.72 | 2.53 | -0.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.28 | 11.37 | -7.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LLY vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LLY drawdown since its inception was -68.24%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LLY and ^GSPC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LLY | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.24% | -56.78% | -11.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.64% | -9.10% | -14.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.48% | -18.90% | -15.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.48% | -25.43% | -9.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.48% | -33.92% | -0.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.41% | -2.34% | -0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.21% | -10.72% | -8.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.49% | 2.02% | +7.47% |
Volatility
LLY vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison
Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) has a higher volatility of 9.27% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 4.43%. This indicates that LLY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LLY | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.27% | 4.43% | +4.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.16% | 9.70% | +17.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.01% | 12.38% | +25.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.46% | 16.97% | +15.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.19% | 18.09% | +12.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LLY and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LLY has higher volatility (9.27%) compared to ^GSPC (4.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LLY dropped -68.24% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.
^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LLY and ^GSPC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer