LLSCX vs. TARKX
Compare and contrast key facts about Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund (LLSCX) and Tarkio Fund (TARKX).
LLSCX is managed by Longleaf Partners. It was launched on Feb 21, 1989. TARKX is managed by Clark Fork Trust. It was launched on Jun 28, 2011.
Performance
LLSCX vs. TARKX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LLSCX vs. TARKX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LLSCX Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund | -3.68% | 7.56% | 9.69% | 20.17% | -19.25% | 11.18% | 4.17% | 27.74% | -6.52% | 9.07% |
TARKX Tarkio Fund | -2.08% | 30.18% | 21.72% | 26.33% | -30.39% | 24.41% | 27.00% | 29.54% | -23.30% | 29.04% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LLSCX achieves a -3.68% return, which is significantly lower than TARKX's -2.08% return. Over the past 10 years, LLSCX has underperformed TARKX with an annualized return of 6.69%, while TARKX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.83% annualized return.
LLSCX
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- -3.81%
- YTD
- -3.68%
- 6M
- -2.59%
- 1Y
- 2.07%
- 3Y*
- 9.42%
- 5Y*
- 1.87%
- 10Y*
- 6.69%
TARKX
- 1D
- -3.29%
- 1M
- -15.81%
- YTD
- -2.08%
- 6M
- 7.21%
- 1Y
- 42.13%
- 3Y*
- 19.68%
- 5Y*
- 7.00%
- 10Y*
- 12.83%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LLSCX vs. TARKX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LLSCX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than TARKX's 1.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LLSCX vs. TARKX — Risk / Return Rank
LLSCX
TARKX
LLSCX vs. TARKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund (LLSCX) and Tarkio Fund (TARKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LLSCX | TARKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.15 | 1.30 | -1.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.32 | 1.86 | -1.53 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.26 | -0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.10 | 2.15 | -2.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.30 | 7.17 | -6.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LLSCX | TARKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 | 1.30 | -1.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | 0.01 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 | 0.03 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.04 | +0.48 |
Correlation
The correlation between LLSCX and TARKX is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
LLSCX vs. TARKX - Dividend Comparison
LLSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, less than TARKX's 5.62% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LLSCX Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund | 1.22% | 1.17% | 0.11% | 0.94% | 1.20% | 0.82% | 5.85% | 14.89% | 18.13% | 8.43% | 18.01% | 5.91% |
TARKX Tarkio Fund | 5.62% | 5.50% | 1.51% | 2.98% | 10.62% | 1.40% | 0.50% | 5.21% | 3.34% | 1.70% | 0.47% | 0.36% |
Drawdowns
LLSCX vs. TARKX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LLSCX drawdown since its inception was -63.97%, smaller than the maximum TARKX drawdown of -95.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LLSCX and TARKX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LLSCX | TARKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.97% | -95.09% | +31.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.47% | -17.33% | +6.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.37% | -95.09% | +66.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.23% | -95.09% | +52.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.92% | -91.77% | +83.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.90% | -17.00% | +8.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.68% | 5.19% | -1.51% |
Volatility
LLSCX vs. TARKX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund (LLSCX) is 3.90%, while Tarkio Fund (TARKX) has a volatility of 10.30%. This indicates that LLSCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TARKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LLSCX | TARKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.90% | 10.30% | -6.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.23% | 21.30% | -12.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.42% | 31.90% | -16.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.00% | 600.49% | -583.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.58% | 424.89% | -400.31% |