PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LLSCX vs. JECIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LLSCX vs. JECIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund (LLSCX) and John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Mid Cap Index Trust Fund (JECIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LLSCX achieves a -6.08% return, which is significantly lower than JECIX's 13.99% return.


LLSCX

1D
-0.58%
1M
-3.05%
YTD
-6.08%
6M
-5.80%
1Y
-1.64%
3Y*
8.14%
5Y*
0.52%
10Y*
5.72%

JECIX

1D
0.89%
1M
3.93%
YTD
13.99%
6M
14.16%
1Y
25.21%
3Y*
15.71%
5Y*
8.00%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LLSCX vs. JECIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LLSCX
Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund
-6.08%7.56%9.69%20.17%-19.25%11.18%4.17%27.74%-6.52%8.71%
JECIX
John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Mid Cap Index Trust Fund
13.99%7.11%13.37%16.06%-13.02%24.16%12.90%25.60%-12.01%6.58%

Correlation

The correlation between LLSCX and JECIX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017

0.79

Over the past year, the correlation between LLSCX and JECIX has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LLSCX vs. JECIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LLSCX
LLSCX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
LLSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LLSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
LLSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
LLSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
LLSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

JECIX
JECIX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
JECIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JECIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
JECIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
JECIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
JECIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LLSCX vs. JECIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund (LLSCX) and John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Mid Cap Index Trust Fund (JECIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LLSCXJECIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.37

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.10

3.90

-4.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.26

14.53

-14.79

LLSCX vs. JECIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LLSCX Sharpe Ratio is -0.09, which is lower than the JECIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LLSCX and JECIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LLSCXJECIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

2.12

-2.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

0.41

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.44

+0.07

Drawdowns

LLSCX vs. JECIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LLSCX drawdown since its inception was -63.97%, which is greater than JECIX's maximum drawdown of -42.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LLSCX and JECIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LLSCXJECIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.97%

-42.07%

-21.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.30%

-8.86%

-2.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.40%

-24.16%

+8.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.37%

-24.16%

-4.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.22%

0.00%

-10.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.90%

-6.47%

-2.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.44%

3.40%

+1.04%

Volatility

LLSCX vs. JECIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund (LLSCX) is 3.31%, while John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Mid Cap Index Trust Fund (JECIX) has a volatility of 5.04%. This indicates that LLSCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JECIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LLSCXJECIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.31%

5.04%

-1.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.52%

12.57%

-4.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.75%

16.33%

-3.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.97%

20.41%

-3.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.58%

21.99%

+2.59%

LLSCX vs. JECIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LLSCX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than JECIX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

LLSCX vs. JECIX - Dividend Comparison

LLSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, less than JECIX's 7.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JECIX
John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Mid Cap Index Trust Fund
7.75%8.84%4.56%6.14%18.58%6.37%11.51%9.64%9.09%0.22%0.00%0.00%
LLSCX
Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund
1.25%1.17%0.11%0.94%1.20%0.82%5.85%14.89%18.13%8.43%18.01%5.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


LLSCX and JECIX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JECIX has higher volatility (5.04%) compared to LLSCX (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LLSCX dropped -63.97% vs JECIX's -42.07%.

JECIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LLSCX and JECIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer