PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LLSCX vs. BIGTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LLSCX vs. BIGTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund (LLSCX) and The Texas Fund (BIGTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LLSCX vs. BIGTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LLSCX
Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund
-3.68%7.56%9.69%20.17%-19.25%11.18%4.17%27.74%-6.52%9.07%
BIGTX
The Texas Fund
7.11%5.98%15.76%11.32%-6.93%23.90%13.11%9.61%-11.44%11.58%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LLSCX achieves a -3.68% return, which is significantly lower than BIGTX's 7.11% return. Over the past 10 years, LLSCX has underperformed BIGTX with an annualized return of 6.69%, while BIGTX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.36% annualized return.


LLSCX

1D
0.61%
1M
-3.81%
YTD
-3.68%
6M
-2.59%
1Y
2.07%
3Y*
9.42%
5Y*
1.87%
10Y*
6.69%

BIGTX

1D
-1.68%
1M
-4.53%
YTD
7.11%
6M
2.67%
1Y
21.13%
3Y*
14.02%
5Y*
7.02%
10Y*
9.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LLSCX vs. BIGTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LLSCX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than BIGTX's 1.67% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

LLSCX vs. BIGTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LLSCX
LLSCX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
LLSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LLSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
LLSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
LLSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
LLSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

BIGTX
BIGTX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
BIGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
BIGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LLSCX vs. BIGTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund (LLSCX) and The Texas Fund (BIGTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LLSCXBIGTXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.15

1.22

-1.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.32

1.77

-1.45

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.24

-0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.10

1.71

-1.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.30

7.33

-7.04

LLSCX vs. BIGTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LLSCX Sharpe Ratio is 0.15, which is lower than the BIGTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LLSCX and BIGTX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LLSCXBIGTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

1.22

-1.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

0.01

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

0.01

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.01

+0.51

Correlation

The correlation between LLSCX and BIGTX is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

LLSCX vs. BIGTX - Dividend Comparison

LLSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, less than BIGTX's 6.89% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LLSCX
Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund
1.22%1.17%0.11%0.94%1.20%0.82%5.85%14.89%18.13%8.43%18.01%5.91%
BIGTX
The Texas Fund
6.89%7.38%3.52%2.51%3.06%5.27%0.07%0.08%2.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

LLSCX vs. BIGTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LLSCX drawdown since its inception was -63.97%, smaller than the maximum BIGTX drawdown of -97.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LLSCX and BIGTX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LLSCXBIGTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.97%

-97.22%

+33.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.47%

-11.70%

+1.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.37%

-97.22%

+68.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.23%

-97.22%

+54.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.92%

-96.26%

+88.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.90%

-18.87%

+9.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.68%

2.73%

+0.95%

Volatility

LLSCX vs. BIGTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund (LLSCX) is 3.90%, while The Texas Fund (BIGTX) has a volatility of 4.90%. This indicates that LLSCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BIGTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LLSCXBIGTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.90%

4.90%

-1.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.23%

10.58%

-1.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.42%

17.85%

-2.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.00%

1,245.70%

-1,228.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.58%

880.79%

-856.21%