PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LLSCX vs. ATGAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LLSCX vs. ATGAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund (LLSCX) and Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund (ATGAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


LLSCX

1D
-0.58%
1M
-3.05%
YTD
-6.08%
6M
-5.80%
1Y
-1.64%
3Y*
8.14%
5Y*
0.52%
10Y*
5.72%

ATGAX

1D
1.15%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LLSCX vs. ATGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between LLSCX and ATGAX is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026

0.50

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LLSCX vs. ATGAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LLSCX
LLSCX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
LLSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LLSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
LLSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
LLSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
LLSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

ATGAX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LLSCX vs. ATGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund (LLSCX) and Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund (ATGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LLSCXATGAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.26

LLSCX vs. ATGAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LLSCXATGAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

58.33

-57.83

Drawdowns

LLSCX vs. ATGAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LLSCX drawdown since its inception was -63.97%, which is greater than ATGAX's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LLSCX and ATGAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LLSCXATGAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.97%

0.00%

-63.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.22%

0.00%

-10.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.90%

0.00%

-8.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.44%

Volatility

LLSCX vs. ATGAX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LLSCXATGAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.75%

9.26%

+3.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.97%

9.26%

+7.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.58%

9.26%

+15.32%

LLSCX vs. ATGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LLSCX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than ATGAX's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

LLSCX vs. ATGAX - Dividend Comparison

LLSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, while ATGAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ATGAX
Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LLSCX
Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund
1.25%1.17%0.11%0.94%1.20%0.82%5.85%14.89%18.13%8.43%18.01%5.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


LLSCX and ATGAX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LLSCX and ATGAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer