PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LLLRX vs. FYMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LLLRX vs. FYMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Multi-Asset Growth Fund R (LLLRX) and Fidelity Sustainable Multi-Asset Fund (FYMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with LLLRX at 9.89% and FYMIX at 9.89%.


LLLRX

1D
-0.27%
1M
1.59%
YTD
9.89%
6M
9.07%
1Y
22.84%
3Y*
16.91%
5Y*
9.01%
10Y*
10.06%

FYMIX

1D
-0.15%
1M
1.64%
YTD
9.89%
6M
9.48%
1Y
23.19%
3Y*
15.73%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LLLRX vs. FYMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
LLLRX
Franklin Multi-Asset Growth Fund R
9.89%16.07%16.26%16.76%-13.26%
FYMIX
Fidelity Sustainable Multi-Asset Fund
9.89%18.95%11.09%16.15%-15.71%

Correlation

The correlation between LLLRX and FYMIX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2022

0.95

The correlation between LLLRX and FYMIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LLLRX vs. FYMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LLLRX
LLLRX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
LLLRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LLLRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
LLLRX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
LLLRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
LLLRX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

FYMIX
FYMIX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
FYMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FYMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
FYMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
FYMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
FYMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LLLRX vs. FYMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Multi-Asset Growth Fund R (LLLRX) and Fidelity Sustainable Multi-Asset Fund (FYMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LLLRXFYMIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.39

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.76

2.74

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.05

11.69

+0.36

LLLRX vs. FYMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LLLRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is comparable to the FYMIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LLLRX and FYMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LLLRX vs. FYMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LLLRX drawdown since its inception was -32.05%, which is greater than FYMIX's maximum drawdown of -22.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LLLRX and FYMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LLLRXFYMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.05%

-22.70%

-9.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.69%

-8.80%

+0.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.80%

-12.72%

-4.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.97%

-0.23%

-0.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.51%

-5.58%

+0.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

2.06%

-0.07%

Volatility

LLLRX vs. FYMIX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Multi-Asset Growth Fund R (LLLRX) has a higher volatility of 4.89% compared to Fidelity Sustainable Multi-Asset Fund (FYMIX) at 4.53%. This indicates that LLLRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FYMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LLLRXFYMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.89%

4.53%

+0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.92%

9.72%

+0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.21%

11.47%

+0.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.57%

12.81%

+1.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.94%

12.81%

+2.13%

LLLRX vs. FYMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LLLRX has a 1.46% expense ratio, which is higher than FYMIX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

LLLRX vs. FYMIX - Dividend Comparison

LLLRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.60%, more than FYMIX's 3.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FYMIX
Fidelity Sustainable Multi-Asset Fund
3.35%3.69%1.84%1.78%1.79%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LLLRX
Franklin Multi-Asset Growth Fund R
11.60%11.15%6.02%5.28%8.64%7.09%4.77%5.64%5.76%11.27%4.31%11.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, LLLRX and FYMIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

LLLRX has higher volatility (4.89%) compared to FYMIX (4.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LLLRX dropped -32.05% vs FYMIX's -22.70%.

FYMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LLLRX and FYMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer