LLII vs. WTIU
LLII (REX LLY Growth & Income ETF) and WTIU (MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - LLII is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by REX, while WTIU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive MicroSectors Energy Index - Benchmark TR Gross (--300%). LLII is actively managed, while WTIU is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.21, they often move in opposite directions. LLII charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for WTIU.
Performance
LLII vs. WTIU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LLII achieves a 2.07% return, which is significantly lower than WTIU's 48.25% return.
LLII
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 6.03%
- YTD
- 2.07%
- 6M
- 3.04%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WTIU
- 1D
- 1.81%
- 1M
- -23.04%
- YTD
- 48.25%
- 6M
- 48.93%
- 1Y
- 40.86%
- 3Y*
- 0.71%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LLII vs. WTIU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LLII REX LLY Growth & Income ETF | 2.07% | 19.74% |
WTIU MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN | 48.25% | -2.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between LLII and WTIU is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2025 | -0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LLII vs. WTIU — Risk / Return Rank
LLII
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
WTIU
LLII vs. WTIU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX LLY Growth & Income ETF (LLII) and MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LLII | WTIU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.14 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.87 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 2.30 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LLII vs. WTIU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LLII drawdown since its inception was -23.96%, smaller than the maximum WTIU drawdown of -75.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LLII and WTIU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LLII | WTIU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.96% | -75.73% | +51.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -47.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -75.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.71% | -47.45% | +46.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.63% | -39.19% | +30.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 17.80% | — |
Volatility
LLII vs. WTIU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LLII | WTIU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 23.51% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 56.01% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.58% | 68.81% | -33.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.58% | 70.79% | -35.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.58% | 70.79% | -35.21% |
LLII vs. WTIU - Expense Ratio Comparison
LLII has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than WTIU's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
LLII vs. WTIU - Dividend Comparison
LLII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.62%, while WTIU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
LLII REX LLY Growth & Income ETF | 25.62% | 5.13% |
WTIU MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LLII and WTIU have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WTIU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WTIU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for LLII.
LLII has the higher dividend yield at 25.62%, compared with 0.00% for WTIU.
LLII is categorized as Derivative Income, while WTIU is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for LLII and 0.95% for WTIU.
Find the right allocation for LLII and WTIU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer