LLII vs. DBMF

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

LLII (REX LLY Growth & Income ETF) and DBMF (iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LLII is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by REX, while DBMF is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by iM Global Partners. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. LLII charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for DBMF.

Performance

LLII vs. DBMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in REX LLY Growth & Income ETF (LLII) and iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LLII achieves a 2.07% return, which is significantly lower than DBMF's 9.37% return.

LLII

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 6.03%
• YTD: 2.07%
• 6M: 3.04%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DBMF

• 1D: -1.26%
• 1M: -1.67%
• YTD: 9.37%
• 6M: 8.47%
• 1Y: 26.10%
• 3Y*: 8.78%
• 5Y*: 7.97%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LLII vs. DBMF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LLII REX LLY Growth & Income ETF	2.07%	19.74%
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF	9.37%	2.84%

Correlation

The correlation between LLII and DBMF is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2025	-0.08

Return for Risk

LLII vs. DBMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LLII

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DBMF

DBMF Risk / Return Rank: 74
DBMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
DBMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
DBMF Omega Ratio Rank: 78
DBMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
DBMF Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LLII vs. DBMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX LLY Growth & Income ETF (LLII) and iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LLII	DBMF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.10	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.77	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.44	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	4.30	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	15.28	—

Drawdowns

LLII vs. DBMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LLII drawdown since its inception was -23.96%, which is greater than DBMF's maximum drawdown of -20.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LLII and DBMF.

Drawdown Indicators

	LLII	DBMF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.96%	-20.39%	-3.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.10%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.60%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.39%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.71%	-2.71%	+2.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.63%	-6.55%	-2.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.71%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LLII	DBMF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.11%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.14%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.58%	12.47%	+23.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.58%	12.53%	+23.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.58%	12.41%	+23.17%

LLII vs. DBMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

LLII has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than DBMF's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

LLII vs. DBMF - Dividend Comparison

LLII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.62%, more than DBMF's 5.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF	5.23%	5.91%	5.75%	2.91%	7.72%	10.38%	0.86%	9.35%
LLII REX LLY Growth & Income ETF	25.62%	5.13%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LLII and DBMF in my portfolio?

LLII and DBMF have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LLII or DBMF?

On fees, DBMF is cheaper at 0.85% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LLII or DBMF?

DBMF is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for LLII.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LLII or DBMF?

LLII has the higher dividend yield at 25.62%, compared with 5.23% for DBMF.

What is the main difference between LLII and DBMF?

LLII is categorized as Derivative Income, while DBMF is Systematic Trend. They also come from different issuers: REX and iM Global Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for LLII and 0.85% for DBMF.