LLII vs. BCD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LLII (REX LLY Growth & Income ETF) and BCD (abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LLII is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by REX, while BCD is a Commodities fund actively managed by Aberdeen. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.20, they often move in opposite directions. LLII charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for BCD.

Performance

LLII vs. BCD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in REX LLY Growth & Income ETF (LLII) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LLII achieves a -4.28% return, which is significantly lower than BCD's 20.45% return.

LLII

• 1D: 1.47%
• 1M: 9.79%
• YTD: -4.28%
• 6M: 0.70%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BCD

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: -1.43%
• YTD: 20.45%
• 6M: 20.51%
• 1Y: 31.80%
• 3Y*: 14.44%
• 5Y*: 11.98%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LLII vs. BCD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LLII REX LLY Growth & Income ETF	-4.28%	19.03%
BCD abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF	20.45%	3.14%

Correlation

The correlation between LLII and BCD is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025	-0.20

Return for Risk

LLII vs. BCD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCD

BCD Risk / Return Rank: 71
BCD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
BCD Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
BCD Omega Ratio Rank: 70
BCD Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
BCD Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LLII vs. BCD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX LLY Growth & Income ETF (LLII) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LLII	BCD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.33	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.78	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.71	0.67	+0.04

Drawdowns

LLII vs. BCD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LLII drawdown since its inception was -23.96%, smaller than the maximum BCD drawdown of -29.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LLII and BCD.

Drawdown Indicators

	LLII	BCD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.96%	-29.81%	+5.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.22%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-10.50%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-23.03%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.88%	-3.60%	-3.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.28%	-9.86%	+0.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.54%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LLII	BCD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.33%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.74%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.42%	13.72%	+22.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.42%	15.41%	+21.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.42%	13.90%	+22.52%

LLII vs. BCD - Expense Ratio Comparison

LLII has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than BCD's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

LLII vs. BCD - Dividend Comparison

LLII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.95%, more than BCD's 14.29% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BCD abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF	14.29%	17.21%	3.60%	4.51%	5.21%	8.30%	1.29%	1.55%	1.59%	0.07%
LLII REX LLY Growth & Income ETF	25.95%	5.13%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LLII and BCD in my portfolio?

LLII and BCD have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LLII or BCD?

On fees, BCD is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LLII or BCD?

BCD is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for LLII.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LLII or BCD?

LLII has the higher dividend yield at 25.95%, compared with 14.29% for BCD.

What is the main difference between LLII and BCD?

LLII is categorized as Derivative Income, while BCD is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: REX and Aberdeen. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for LLII and 0.29% for BCD.