PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LLII vs. AMDY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LLII vs. AMDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in REX LLY Growth & Income ETF (LLII) and YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LLII achieves a -4.28% return, which is significantly lower than AMDY's 110.49% return.


LLII

1D
1.47%
1M
9.79%
YTD
-4.28%
6M
0.70%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AMDY

1D
3.39%
1M
46.76%
YTD
110.49%
6M
111.80%
1Y
240.44%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LLII vs. AMDY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
LLII
REX LLY Growth & Income ETF
-4.28%19.03%
AMDY
YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF
110.49%-12.11%

Correlation

The correlation between LLII and AMDY is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025

0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LLII vs. AMDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LLII

AMDY
AMDY Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
AMDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMDY Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
AMDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMDY Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LLII vs. AMDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX LLY Growth & Income ETF (LLII) and YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

LLII vs. AMDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LLIIAMDYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

1.25

-0.54

Drawdowns

LLII vs. AMDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LLII drawdown since its inception was -23.96%, smaller than the maximum AMDY drawdown of -53.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LLII and AMDY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LLIIAMDYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.96%

-53.92%

+29.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.88%

0.00%

-6.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.28%

-18.02%

+8.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.22%

Volatility

LLII vs. AMDY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LLIIAMDYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.42%

53.40%

-16.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.42%

46.01%

-9.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.42%

46.01%

-9.59%

LLII vs. AMDY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both LLII and AMDY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.


Dividends

LLII vs. AMDY - Dividend Comparison

LLII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.95%, less than AMDY's 54.91% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
AMDY
YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF
54.91%80.68%109.98%6.68%
LLII
REX LLY Growth & Income ETF
25.95%5.13%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LLII and AMDY have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LLII and AMDY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

AMDY has the higher dividend yield at 54.91%, compared with 25.95% for LLII.

LLII is categorized as Derivative Income, while AMDY is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: REX and YieldMax.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LLII and AMDY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer