LLII vs. AMDY
LLII (REX LLY Growth & Income ETF) and AMDY (YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LLII is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by REX, while AMDY is a Options Trading fund actively managed by YieldMax. Both are actively managed. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
LLII vs. AMDY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LLII achieves a -4.28% return, which is significantly lower than AMDY's 110.49% return.
LLII
- 1D
- 1.47%
- 1M
- 9.79%
- YTD
- -4.28%
- 6M
- 0.70%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMDY
- 1D
- 3.39%
- 1M
- 46.76%
- YTD
- 110.49%
- 6M
- 111.80%
- 1Y
- 240.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LLII vs. AMDY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LLII REX LLY Growth & Income ETF | -4.28% | 19.03% |
AMDY YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF | 110.49% | -12.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between LLII and AMDY is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025 | 0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LLII vs. AMDY — Risk / Return Rank
LLII
AMDY
LLII vs. AMDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX LLY Growth & Income ETF (LLII) and YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LLII | AMDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 4.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 1.25 | -0.54 |
Drawdowns
LLII vs. AMDY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LLII drawdown since its inception was -23.96%, smaller than the maximum AMDY drawdown of -53.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LLII and AMDY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LLII | AMDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.96% | -53.92% | +29.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -27.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.88% | 0.00% | -6.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.28% | -18.02% | +8.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 12.22% | — |
Volatility
LLII vs. AMDY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LLII | AMDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 20.81% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 39.99% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.42% | 53.40% | -16.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.42% | 46.01% | -9.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.42% | 46.01% | -9.59% |
LLII vs. AMDY - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both LLII and AMDY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
LLII vs. AMDY - Dividend Comparison
LLII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.95%, less than AMDY's 54.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMDY YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF | 54.91% | 80.68% | 109.98% | 6.68% |
LLII REX LLY Growth & Income ETF | 25.95% | 5.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LLII and AMDY have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LLII and AMDY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
AMDY has the higher dividend yield at 54.91%, compared with 25.95% for LLII.
LLII is categorized as Derivative Income, while AMDY is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: REX and YieldMax.
Find the right allocation for LLII and AMDY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer