LLHE.TO vs. CNQE.TO
LLHE.TO (Harvest Eli Lilly Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units) and CNQE.TO (Harvest CNQ Enhanced High Income Shares ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from Harvest. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.40% expense ratio.
Performance
LLHE.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LLHE.TO achieves a 3.96% return, which is significantly lower than CNQE.TO's 39.35% return.
LLHE.TO
- 1D
- 1.73%
- 1M
- 14.44%
- YTD
- 3.96%
- 6M
- 8.11%
- 1Y
- 49.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CNQE.TO
- 1D
- 1.83%
- 1M
- 3.29%
- YTD
- 39.35%
- 6M
- 37.15%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LLHE.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LLHE.TO Harvest Eli Lilly Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units | 3.96% | 49.29% |
CNQE.TO Harvest CNQ Enhanced High Income Shares ETF | 39.35% | 13.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between LLHE.TO and CNQE.TO is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2025 | -0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LLHE.TO vs. CNQE.TO — Risk / Return Rank
LLHE.TO
CNQE.TO
LLHE.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Eli Lilly Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (LLHE.TO) and Harvest CNQ Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (CNQE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LLHE.TO | CNQE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.00 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.13 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LLHE.TO | CNQE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.25 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 2.48 | -2.32 |
Drawdowns
LLHE.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LLHE.TO drawdown since its inception was -37.80%, which is greater than CNQE.TO's maximum drawdown of -18.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LLHE.TO and CNQE.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LLHE.TO | CNQE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.80% | -18.22% | -19.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.88% | -6.08% | +3.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.72% | -4.12% | -9.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.78% | — | — |
Volatility
LLHE.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LLHE.TO | CNQE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.63% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.97% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.18% | 33.12% | +7.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.78% | 33.12% | +8.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.78% | 33.12% | +8.66% |
LLHE.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both LLHE.TO and CNQE.TO have an expense ratio of 0.40%.
Dividends
LLHE.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Dividend Comparison
LLHE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.31%, more than CNQE.TO's 9.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CNQE.TO Harvest CNQ Enhanced High Income Shares ETF | 9.40% | 4.42% | 0.00% |
LLHE.TO Harvest Eli Lilly Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units | 21.31% | 20.89% | 7.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LLHE.TO and CNQE.TO have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.40% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LLHE.TO and CNQE.TO have the same expense ratio: 0.40% per year.
Find the right allocation for LLHE.TO and CNQE.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer