LLGLX vs. LLPFX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

LLGLX (Longleaf Partners Global Fund) and LLPFX (Longleaf Partners Fund) are both mutual funds - LLGLX is a Global Equities fund managed by Longleaf Partners, while LLPFX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Longleaf Partners. Over the past 10 years, LLGLX returned 7.30%/yr vs 5.52%/yr for LLPFX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LLGLX charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for LLPFX.

Performance

LLGLX vs. LLPFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Longleaf Partners Global Fund (LLGLX) and Longleaf Partners Fund (LLPFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LLGLX achieves a -0.57% return, which is significantly higher than LLPFX's -3.83% return. Over the past 10 years, LLGLX has outperformed LLPFX with an annualized return of 7.30%, while LLPFX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.52% annualized return.

LLGLX

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: -0.29%
• YTD: -0.57%
• 6M: -0.93%
• 1Y: 10.31%
• 3Y*: 10.09%
• 5Y*: 2.47%
• 10Y*: 7.30%

LLPFX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.79%
• YTD: -3.83%
• 6M: -4.52%
• 1Y: 0.68%
• 3Y*: 5.19%
• 5Y*: 0.79%
• 10Y*: 5.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LLGLX vs. LLPFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LLGLX Longleaf Partners Global Fund	-0.57%	16.68%	10.54%	22.48%	-24.14%	8.09%	3.60%	22.46%	-16.14%	26.34%
LLPFX Longleaf Partners Fund	-3.83%	2.88%	8.82%	24.50%	-23.20%	23.42%	10.27%	16.81%	-17.94%	15.55%

Correlation

The correlation between LLGLX and LLPFX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013	0.91

The correlation between LLGLX and LLPFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LLGLX vs. LLPFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LLGLX

LLGLX Risk / Return Rank: 9
LLGLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
LLGLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
LLGLX Omega Ratio Rank: 9
LLGLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
LLGLX Martin Ratio Rank: 8

LLPFX

LLPFX Risk / Return Rank: 3
LLPFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
LLPFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
LLPFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3
LLPFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
LLPFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LLGLX vs. LLPFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Longleaf Partners Global Fund (LLGLX) and Longleaf Partners Fund (LLPFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LLGLX	LLPFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.74	0.08	+0.66
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.16	0.22	+0.94
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.02	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.78	0.12	+0.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.99	0.25	+1.74

LLGLX vs. LLPFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LLGLX Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is higher than the LLPFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LLGLX and LLPFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LLGLX vs. LLPFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LLGLX drawdown since its inception was -40.46%, smaller than the maximum LLPFX drawdown of -65.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LLGLX and LLPFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LLGLX	LLPFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.46%	-65.74%	+25.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.45%	-9.77%	-3.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.94%	-19.52%	-0.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.50%	-32.06%	-4.44%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.46%	-43.57%	+3.11%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.75%	-7.29%	-0.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.84%	-9.44%	-1.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.27%	4.60%	+0.67%

Volatility

LLGLX vs. LLPFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Longleaf Partners Global Fund (LLGLX) is 3.14%, while Longleaf Partners Fund (LLPFX) has a volatility of 3.88%. This indicates that LLGLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LLPFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LLGLX	LLPFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.14%	3.88%	-0.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.15%	9.01%	+0.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.23%	14.26%	-0.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.48%	18.40%	+0.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.91%	19.29%	-0.38%

LLGLX vs. LLPFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LLGLX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than LLPFX's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

LLGLX vs. LLPFX - Dividend Comparison

LLGLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.63%, less than LLPFX's 13.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LLGLX Longleaf Partners Global Fund	9.63%	9.57%	3.16%	0.14%	0.90%	7.15%	2.99%	4.31%	12.38%	1.09%	0.49%	0.24%
LLPFX Longleaf Partners Fund	13.38%	12.87%	1.02%	0.67%	4.49%	7.79%	2.95%	5.44%	22.49%	8.85%	2.10%	18.65%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LLGLX and LLPFX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, LLGLX and LLPFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, LLGLX or LLPFX?

LLPFX has higher volatility (3.88%) compared to LLGLX (3.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LLGLX dropped -40.46% vs LLPFX's -65.74%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LLGLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.74 vs 0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.