LLGLX vs. GQFPX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

LLGLX (Longleaf Partners Global Fund) and GQFPX (GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 3 years, LLGLX returned 10.09%/yr vs 12.57%/yr for GQFPX. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LLGLX charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for GQFPX.

Performance

LLGLX vs. GQFPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Longleaf Partners Global Fund (LLGLX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LLGLX achieves a -0.57% return, which is significantly lower than GQFPX's 6.17% return.

LLGLX

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: -0.29%
• YTD: -0.57%
• 6M: -0.93%
• 1Y: 10.31%
• 3Y*: 10.09%
• 5Y*: 2.47%
• 10Y*: 7.30%

GQFPX

• 1D: -1.22%
• 1M: -5.13%
• YTD: 6.17%
• 6M: 7.16%
• 1Y: 13.13%
• 3Y*: 12.57%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LLGLX vs. GQFPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
LLGLX Longleaf Partners Global Fund	-0.57%	16.68%	10.54%	22.48%	-24.14%	-5.45%
GQFPX GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund	6.17%	19.29%	4.81%	15.09%	-1.13%	5.03%

Correlation

The correlation between LLGLX and GQFPX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2021	0.61

Over the past year, the correlation between LLGLX and GQFPX has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.61, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

LLGLX vs. GQFPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LLGLX

LLGLX Risk / Return Rank: 9
LLGLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
LLGLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
LLGLX Omega Ratio Rank: 9
LLGLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
LLGLX Martin Ratio Rank: 8

GQFPX

GQFPX Risk / Return Rank: 27
GQFPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
GQFPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
GQFPX Omega Ratio Rank: 23
GQFPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
GQFPX Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LLGLX vs. GQFPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Longleaf Partners Global Fund (LLGLX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LLGLX	GQFPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.74	1.35	-0.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.16	1.91	-0.75
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.23	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.78	2.12	-1.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.99	6.42	-4.43

LLGLX vs. GQFPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LLGLX Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is lower than the GQFPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LLGLX and GQFPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LLGLX vs. GQFPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LLGLX drawdown since its inception was -40.46%, which is greater than GQFPX's maximum drawdown of -16.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LLGLX and GQFPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LLGLX	GQFPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.46%	-16.95%	-23.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.45%	-6.25%	-7.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.94%	-10.57%	-9.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.50%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.46%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.75%	-6.25%	-1.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.84%	-3.02%	-7.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.27%	2.05%	+3.22%

Volatility

LLGLX vs. GQFPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Longleaf Partners Global Fund (LLGLX) is 3.14%, while GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX) has a volatility of 3.41%. This indicates that LLGLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GQFPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LLGLX	GQFPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.14%	3.41%	-0.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.15%	8.05%	+1.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.23%	9.82%	+4.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.48%	12.83%	+5.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.91%	12.83%	+6.08%

LLGLX vs. GQFPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LLGLX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than GQFPX's 0.86% expense ratio.

Dividends

LLGLX vs. GQFPX - Dividend Comparison

LLGLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.63%, more than GQFPX's 6.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GQFPX GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund	6.01%	5.32%	3.71%	3.69%	5.18%	1.38%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LLGLX Longleaf Partners Global Fund	9.63%	9.57%	3.16%	0.14%	0.90%	7.15%	2.99%	4.31%	12.38%	1.09%	0.49%	0.24%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LLGLX and GQFPX in my portfolio?

LLGLX and GQFPX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LLGLX or GQFPX?

GQFPX has higher volatility (3.41%) compared to LLGLX (3.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LLGLX dropped -40.46% vs GQFPX's -16.95%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GQFPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.