LLDR vs. GGOV
LLDR (Global X Long-Term Treasury Ladder ETF) and GGOV (iShares Global Government Bond USD Hedged Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LLDR is a Government Bonds fund managed by Global X, while GGOV is a Global Bonds fund managed by iShares. Over the past year, LLDR returned 2.86% vs 0.25% for GGOV. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LLDR charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for GGOV.
Performance
LLDR vs. GGOV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LLDR achieves a 0.69% return, which is significantly lower than GGOV's 2.94% return.
LLDR
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- 1.16%
- YTD
- 0.69%
- 6M
- 0.13%
- 1Y
- 2.86%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GGOV
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 2.94%
- 6M
- 2.71%
- 1Y
- 0.25%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LLDR vs. GGOV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LLDR Global X Long-Term Treasury Ladder ETF | 0.69% | 3.05% |
GGOV iShares Global Government Bond USD Hedged Active ETF | 2.94% | -2.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between LLDR and GGOV is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.62 |
The correlation between LLDR and GGOV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LLDR vs. GGOV — Risk / Return Rank
LLDR
GGOV
LLDR vs. GGOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Long-Term Treasury Ladder ETF (LLDR) and iShares Global Government Bond USD Hedged Active ETF (GGOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LLDR | GGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.01 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.41 | 0.05 | +0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.04 | 0.12 | +0.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LLDR vs. GGOV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LLDR drawdown since its inception was -12.46%, which is greater than GGOV's maximum drawdown of -4.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LLDR and GGOV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LLDR | GGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.46% | -4.69% | -7.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.00% | -4.69% | -2.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.62% | -0.89% | -3.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.42% | -1.55% | -4.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.75% | 2.11% | +0.64% |
Volatility
LLDR vs. GGOV - Volatility Comparison
Global X Long-Term Treasury Ladder ETF (LLDR) has a higher volatility of 2.53% compared to iShares Global Government Bond USD Hedged Active ETF (GGOV) at 0.97%. This indicates that LLDR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GGOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LLDR | GGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.53% | 0.97% | +1.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.14% | 3.62% | +2.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.41% | 5.27% | +3.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.08% | 5.25% | +4.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.08% | 5.25% | +4.83% |
LLDR vs. GGOV - Expense Ratio Comparison
LLDR has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than GGOV's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
LLDR vs. GGOV - Dividend Comparison
LLDR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.55%, while GGOV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
GGOV iShares Global Government Bond USD Hedged Active ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LLDR Global X Long-Term Treasury Ladder ETF | 4.55% | 4.42% | 1.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LLDR and GGOV have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LLDR has higher volatility (2.53%) compared to GGOV (0.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LLDR dropped -12.46% vs GGOV's -4.69%.
On 1-year performance, LLDR leads with 2.86% vs 0.25% for GGOV. On fees, LLDR is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, GGOV has been the lower-risk option at 0.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, LLDR has performed better with a 2.86% return vs 0.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LLDR is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for GGOV.
LLDR has the higher dividend yield at 4.55%, compared with 0.00% for GGOV.
LLDR is categorized as Government Bonds, while GGOV is Global Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for LLDR and 0.39% for GGOV.
LLDR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.34 vs 0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LLDR and GGOV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer