PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LKSMX vs. VMGMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LKSMX vs. VMGMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LKCM Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund (LKSMX) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Fund Admiral Shares (VMGMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LKSMX achieves a 4.67% return, which is significantly lower than VMGMX's 8.36% return. Over the past 10 years, LKSMX has underperformed VMGMX with an annualized return of 11.07%, while VMGMX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.17% annualized return.


LKSMX

1D
-0.67%
1M
1.19%
YTD
4.67%
6M
5.23%
1Y
9.61%
3Y*
13.97%
5Y*
5.61%
10Y*
11.07%

VMGMX

1D
-0.83%
1M
4.40%
YTD
8.36%
6M
6.16%
1Y
11.48%
3Y*
16.24%
5Y*
6.88%
10Y*
12.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LKSMX vs. VMGMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LKSMX
LKCM Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund
4.67%5.27%15.64%25.76%-22.23%15.44%30.55%31.02%-8.91%24.18%
VMGMX
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Fund Admiral Shares
8.36%10.69%15.65%23.93%-28.84%20.48%34.45%33.85%-5.61%21.83%

Correlation

The correlation between LKSMX and VMGMX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2011

0.92

The correlation between LKSMX and VMGMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LKSMX vs. VMGMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LKSMX
LKSMX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
LKSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LKSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
LKSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
LKSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
LKSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

VMGMX
VMGMX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
VMGMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMGMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMGMX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
VMGMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMGMX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LKSMX vs. VMGMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LKCM Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund (LKSMX) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Fund Admiral Shares (VMGMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LKSMXVMGMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.13

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.75

0.72

+0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.43

2.16

+0.27

LKSMX vs. VMGMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LKSMX Sharpe Ratio is 0.58, which is comparable to the VMGMX Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LKSMX and VMGMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LKSMXVMGMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

0.72

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.32

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.58

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.64

-0.23

Drawdowns

LKSMX vs. VMGMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LKSMX drawdown since its inception was -39.56%, which is greater than VMGMX's maximum drawdown of -37.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LKSMX and VMGMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LKSMXVMGMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.56%

-37.17%

-2.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.08%

-15.95%

+2.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.23%

-21.65%

+0.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.51%

-37.17%

+9.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.56%

-37.17%

-2.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.86%

-0.83%

-2.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.73%

-7.02%

-0.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.04%

5.31%

-1.27%

Volatility

LKSMX vs. VMGMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for LKCM Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund (LKSMX) is 4.13%, while Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Fund Admiral Shares (VMGMX) has a volatility of 4.42%. This indicates that LKSMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VMGMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LKSMXVMGMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.13%

4.42%

-0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.00%

12.46%

+0.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.86%

15.92%

+0.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.81%

21.42%

-1.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.37%

20.99%

+0.38%

LKSMX vs. VMGMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LKSMX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than VMGMX's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

LKSMX vs. VMGMX - Dividend Comparison

LKSMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.09%, more than VMGMX's 0.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LKSMX
LKCM Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund
6.09%6.38%0.00%0.00%8.27%17.23%6.48%14.23%21.66%12.01%18.07%7.12%
VMGMX
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Fund Admiral Shares
0.61%0.64%0.67%0.71%0.78%0.34%0.56%0.78%0.84%0.72%0.81%0.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


LKSMX and VMGMX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VMGMX has higher volatility (4.42%) compared to LKSMX (4.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LKSMX dropped -39.56% vs VMGMX's -37.17%.

VMGMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.72 vs 0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LKSMX and VMGMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer