LKOR vs. QCON

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LKOR (FlexShares Credit-Scored U.S. Long Corporate Bond Index Fund) and QCON (American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. LKOR is passively managed, while QCON is actively managed. LKOR charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for QCON.

Performance

LKOR vs. QCON - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Credit-Scored U.S. Long Corporate Bond Index Fund (LKOR) and American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

LKOR

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: 1.51%
• YTD: 0.74%
• 6M: -0.19%
• 1Y: 7.57%
• 3Y*: 4.72%
• 5Y*: -1.59%
• 10Y*: 2.45%

QCON

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LKOR vs. QCON - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
LKOR FlexShares Credit-Scored U.S. Long Corporate Bond Index Fund	-0.04%
QCON American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF	0.00%

Return for Risk

LKOR vs. QCON — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LKOR

LKOR Risk / Return Rank: 26
LKOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
LKOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
LKOR Omega Ratio Rank: 24
LKOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
LKOR Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LKOR vs. QCON - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Credit-Scored U.S. Long Corporate Bond Index Fund (LKOR) and American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LKOR	QCON	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.95	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.40	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.41	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.43	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LKOR	QCON	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.12	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.19	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.25	—	—

Drawdowns

LKOR vs. QCON - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LKOR drawdown since its inception was -34.78%, which is greater than QCON's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LKOR and QCON.

Drawdown Indicators

	LKOR	QCON	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.78%	0.00%	-34.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.39%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.74%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.78%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.78%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.63%	0.00%	-13.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.36%	0.00%	-10.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.21%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LKOR	QCON	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.41%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.76%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.00%	0.00%	+8.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.90%	0.00%	+12.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.22%	0.00%	+13.22%

LKOR vs. QCON - Expense Ratio Comparison

LKOR has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than QCON's 0.32% expense ratio.

Dividends

LKOR vs. QCON - Dividend Comparison

LKOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.72%, while QCON has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LKOR FlexShares Credit-Scored U.S. Long Corporate Bond Index Fund	5.72%	5.57%	5.52%	4.90%	4.71%	4.73%	6.56%	3.71%	4.21%	3.77%	5.53%	1.22%
QCON American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, LKOR or QCON?

On fees, LKOR is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LKOR or QCON?

LKOR is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for QCON.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LKOR or QCON?

LKOR has the higher dividend yield at 5.72%, compared with 0.00% for QCON.

What is the main difference between LKOR and QCON?

They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for LKOR and 0.32% for QCON.