LKOR.DE vs. PAC.DE
LKOR.DE (Amundi MSCI Korea UCITS ETF Acc) and PAC.DE (BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - LKOR.DE tracks the MSCI Korea 20/35 while PAC.DE tracks the MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LKOR.DE returned 19.86%/yr vs 5.97%/yr for PAC.DE. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LKOR.DE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.16%/yr for PAC.DE.
Performance
LKOR.DE vs. PAC.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LKOR.DE achieves a 108.92% return, which is significantly higher than PAC.DE's 8.00% return.
LKOR.DE
- 1D
- -5.01%
- 1M
- 16.76%
- YTD
- 108.92%
- 6M
- 128.25%
- 1Y
- 228.86%
- 3Y*
- 45.45%
- 5Y*
- 19.86%
- 10Y*
- 16.69%
PAC.DE
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- -0.06%
- YTD
- 8.00%
- 6M
- 9.57%
- 1Y
- 12.71%
- 3Y*
- 9.63%
- 5Y*
- 5.97%
- 10Y*
- —
LKOR.DE vs. PAC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LKOR.DE Amundi MSCI Korea UCITS ETF Acc | 108.92% | 77.71% | -17.75% | 15.66% | -23.88% | -0.89% | 29.98% | 14.67% | -18.27% | 28.10% |
PAC.DE BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF | 8.00% | 6.73% | 12.07% | 2.38% | 0.50% | 12.85% | -2.66% | 21.45% | -6.04% | 10.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between LKOR.DE and PAC.DE is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2016 | 0.60 |
The correlation between LKOR.DE and PAC.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LKOR.DE vs. PAC.DE — Risk / Return Rank
LKOR.DE
PAC.DE
LKOR.DE vs. PAC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Korea UCITS ETF Acc (LKOR.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (PAC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LKOR.DE | PAC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.79 | 1.19 | +0.60 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.81 | 2.00 | +8.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 39.60 | 5.65 | +33.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LKOR.DE | PAC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.00 | 1.08 | +4.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | 0.41 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.43 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
LKOR.DE vs. PAC.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LKOR.DE drawdown since its inception was -68.29%, which is greater than PAC.DE's maximum drawdown of -36.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LKOR.DE and PAC.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LKOR.DE | PAC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.29% | -36.90% | -31.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.02% | -6.33% | -14.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.36% | -20.21% | -10.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.19% | -20.21% | -20.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.81% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.31% | -2.33% | -2.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.52% | -5.10% | -12.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.75% | 2.25% | +3.50% |
Volatility
LKOR.DE vs. PAC.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI Korea UCITS ETF Acc (LKOR.DE) has a higher volatility of 17.02% compared to BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (PAC.DE) at 3.19%. This indicates that LKOR.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LKOR.DE | PAC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.02% | 3.19% | +13.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.05% | 8.91% | +24.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.93% | 11.77% | +26.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.70% | 14.54% | +11.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.86% | 16.52% | +8.34% |
LKOR.DE vs. PAC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LKOR.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than PAC.DE's 0.16% expense ratio.
Dividends
LKOR.DE vs. PAC.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither LKOR.DE nor PAC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LKOR.DE and PAC.DE have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PAC.DE is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PAC.DE is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for LKOR.DE.
LKOR.DE tracks MSCI Korea 20/35, while PAC.DE tracks MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and BNP Paribas. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for LKOR.DE and 0.16% for PAC.DE.
Find the right allocation for LKOR.DE and PAC.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer