PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LKOR.DE vs. LCUA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LKOR.DE vs. LCUA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI Korea UCITS ETF Acc (LKOR.DE) and Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc (LCUA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LKOR.DE achieves a 108.92% return, which is significantly higher than LCUA.DE's 31.85% return.


LKOR.DE

1D
-5.01%
1M
16.76%
YTD
108.92%
6M
128.25%
1Y
228.86%
3Y*
45.45%
5Y*
19.86%
10Y*
16.69%

LCUA.DE

1D
-1.97%
1M
7.77%
YTD
31.85%
6M
33.69%
1Y
54.70%
3Y*
22.72%
5Y*
8.90%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LKOR.DE vs. LCUA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
LKOR.DE
Amundi MSCI Korea UCITS ETF Acc
108.92%77.71%-17.75%15.66%-23.88%-0.89%29.98%14.67%-14.21%
LCUA.DE
Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc
31.85%18.08%18.51%3.26%-14.89%1.98%15.44%22.39%-10.90%

Correlation

The correlation between LKOR.DE and LCUA.DE is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2018

0.76

The correlation between LKOR.DE and LCUA.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LKOR.DE vs. LCUA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LKOR.DE
LKOR.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
LKOR.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LKOR.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
LKOR.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
LKOR.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
LKOR.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

LCUA.DE
LCUA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
LCUA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCUA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCUA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
LCUA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCUA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LKOR.DE vs. LCUA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Korea UCITS ETF Acc (LKOR.DE) and Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc (LCUA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LKOR.DELCUA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.79

1.49

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.81

4.49

+6.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

39.60

16.33

+23.27

LKOR.DE vs. LCUA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LKOR.DE Sharpe Ratio is 6.00, which is higher than the LCUA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LKOR.DE and LCUA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LKOR.DELCUA.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.00

2.72

+3.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.48

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.48

-0.13

Drawdowns

LKOR.DE vs. LCUA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LKOR.DE drawdown since its inception was -68.29%, which is greater than LCUA.DE's maximum drawdown of -33.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LKOR.DE and LCUA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LKOR.DELCUA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.29%

-33.18%

-35.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.02%

-12.13%

-8.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.36%

-21.07%

-9.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.19%

-28.54%

-12.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.31%

-2.86%

-2.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.52%

-12.02%

-5.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.75%

3.34%

+2.41%

Volatility

LKOR.DE vs. LCUA.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi MSCI Korea UCITS ETF Acc (LKOR.DE) has a higher volatility of 17.02% compared to Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc (LCUA.DE) at 8.54%. This indicates that LKOR.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LCUA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LKOR.DELCUA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.02%

8.54%

+8.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.05%

17.04%

+16.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.93%

20.08%

+17.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.70%

18.48%

+7.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.86%

19.46%

+5.40%

LKOR.DE vs. LCUA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LKOR.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than LCUA.DE's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

LKOR.DE vs. LCUA.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither LKOR.DE nor LCUA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


LKOR.DE and LCUA.DE have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LCUA.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LCUA.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for LKOR.DE.

LKOR.DE tracks MSCI Korea 20/35, while LCUA.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Asia. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for LKOR.DE and 0.12% for LCUA.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LKOR.DE and LCUA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer