PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LKFIX vs. VBF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LKFIX vs. VBF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LKCM Fixed Income Fund (LKFIX) and Invesco Bond Fund (VBF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LKFIX achieves a 0.19% return, which is significantly higher than VBF's -0.88% return. Over the past 10 years, LKFIX has underperformed VBF with an annualized return of 2.06%, while VBF has yielded a comparatively higher 2.95% annualized return.


LKFIX

1D
-0.09%
1M
-0.00%
YTD
0.19%
6M
0.46%
1Y
4.34%
3Y*
4.47%
5Y*
1.59%
10Y*
2.06%

VBF

1D
-0.13%
1M
-0.22%
YTD
-0.88%
6M
-1.70%
1Y
2.57%
3Y*
5.59%
5Y*
-0.79%
10Y*
2.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LKFIX vs. VBF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LKFIX
LKCM Fixed Income Fund
0.19%6.66%3.06%4.98%-5.63%-1.54%4.29%6.71%0.26%2.15%
VBF
Invesco Bond Fund
-0.88%5.46%6.97%2.27%-17.77%-5.37%12.80%30.91%-11.16%13.35%

Correlation

The correlation between LKFIX and VBF is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 1997

0.17

Over the past year, LKFIX and VBF have become more correlated (0.52) than their long-term average of 0.17, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LKFIX vs. VBF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LKFIX
LKFIX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
LKFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LKFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
LKFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
LKFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
LKFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

VBF
VBF Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
VBF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBF Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBF Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
VBF Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBF Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LKFIX vs. VBF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LKCM Fixed Income Fund (LKFIX) and Invesco Bond Fund (VBF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LKFIXVBFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.61

0.43

+1.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.45

0.69

+1.76

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.08

+0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

0.60

+1.80

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.77

1.67

+6.10

LKFIX vs. VBF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LKFIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is higher than the VBF Sharpe Ratio of 0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LKFIX and VBF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LKFIXVBFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.61

0.43

+1.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

-0.06

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

0.23

+0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.25

0.33

+0.92

Drawdowns

LKFIX vs. VBF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LKFIX drawdown since its inception was -8.97%, smaller than the maximum VBF drawdown of -32.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LKFIX and VBF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LKFIXVBFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.97%

-32.23%

+23.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.76%

-4.03%

+2.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.19%

-11.52%

+9.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.60%

-32.23%

+23.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-8.97%

-32.23%

+23.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.83%

-11.69%

+10.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.12%

-7.24%

+6.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.55%

1.45%

-0.90%

Volatility

LKFIX vs. VBF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for LKCM Fixed Income Fund (LKFIX) is 1.02%, while Invesco Bond Fund (VBF) has a volatility of 1.74%. This indicates that LKFIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VBF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LKFIXVBFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.02%

1.74%

-0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.88%

4.60%

-2.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.58%

6.05%

-3.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.98%

12.39%

-9.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.64%

12.73%

-10.09%

LKFIX vs. VBF - Expense Ratio Comparison

LKFIX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than VBF's 0.62% expense ratio.


Dividends

LKFIX vs. VBF - Dividend Comparison

LKFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%, less than VBF's 5.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LKFIX
LKCM Fixed Income Fund
3.69%3.57%3.03%2.28%1.57%1.36%1.74%2.27%2.26%2.04%2.18%2.78%
VBF
Invesco Bond Fund
5.54%5.46%5.51%5.31%4.60%3.36%6.89%5.04%5.40%5.07%4.56%5.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


LKFIX and VBF have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VBF has higher volatility (1.74%) compared to LKFIX (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LKFIX dropped -8.97% vs VBF's -32.23%.

LKFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LKFIX and VBF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer