LKFIX vs. GSGDX
Compare and contrast key facts about LKCM Fixed Income Fund (LKFIX) and Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Credit Fund (GSGDX).
LKFIX is managed by LKCM. It was launched on Dec 30, 1997. GSGDX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Nov 3, 2003.
Performance
LKFIX vs. GSGDX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LKFIX vs. GSGDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LKFIX LKCM Fixed Income Fund | -0.38% | 6.66% | 3.06% | 4.98% | -5.63% | -1.54% | 4.29% | 6.71% | 0.26% | 2.15% |
GSGDX Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Credit Fund | -1.55% | 8.23% | 1.93% | 8.81% | -17.33% | -0.97% | 10.12% | 16.83% | -2.55% | 6.49% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LKFIX achieves a -0.38% return, which is significantly higher than GSGDX's -1.55% return. Over the past 10 years, LKFIX has underperformed GSGDX with an annualized return of 2.12%, while GSGDX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.78% annualized return.
LKFIX
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- -1.40%
- YTD
- -0.38%
- 6M
- 0.74%
- 1Y
- 4.24%
- 3Y*
- 4.24%
- 5Y*
- 1.60%
- 10Y*
- 2.12%
GSGDX
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- -3.03%
- YTD
- -1.55%
- 6M
- -0.62%
- 1Y
- 3.97%
- 3Y*
- 4.21%
- 5Y*
- 0.35%
- 10Y*
- 2.78%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LKFIX vs. GSGDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LKFIX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than GSGDX's 0.38% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LKFIX vs. GSGDX — Risk / Return Rank
LKFIX
GSGDX
LKFIX vs. GSGDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LKCM Fixed Income Fund (LKFIX) and Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Credit Fund (GSGDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LKFIX | GSGDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.51 | 0.90 | +0.61 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.19 | 1.25 | +0.93 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.16 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.57 | 1.37 | +1.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.06 | 4.55 | +5.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LKFIX | GSGDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.51 | 0.90 | +0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | 0.05 | +0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 | 0.44 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.25 | 0.65 | +0.60 |
Correlation
The correlation between LKFIX and GSGDX is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
LKFIX vs. GSGDX - Dividend Comparison
LKFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.71%, less than GSGDX's 4.46% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LKFIX LKCM Fixed Income Fund | 3.71% | 3.57% | 3.03% | 2.28% | 1.57% | 1.36% | 1.74% | 2.27% | 2.26% | 2.04% | 2.18% | 2.78% |
GSGDX Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Credit Fund | 4.46% | 4.75% | 3.94% | 3.52% | 2.74% | 5.10% | 4.18% | 5.89% | 3.56% | 3.19% | 3.38% | 3.76% |
Drawdowns
LKFIX vs. GSGDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LKFIX drawdown since its inception was -8.97%, smaller than the maximum GSGDX drawdown of -23.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LKFIX and GSGDX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LKFIX | GSGDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.97% | -23.48% | +14.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.76% | -3.59% | +1.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -8.60% | -23.48% | +14.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -8.97% | -23.48% | +14.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.40% | -3.53% | +2.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.12% | -3.89% | +2.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.45% | 1.08% | -0.63% |
Volatility
LKFIX vs. GSGDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for LKCM Fixed Income Fund (LKFIX) is 1.10%, while Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Credit Fund (GSGDX) has a volatility of 1.92%. This indicates that LKFIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSGDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LKFIX | GSGDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.10% | 1.92% | -0.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.66% | 2.93% | -1.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.82% | 5.05% | -2.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.94% | 6.82% | -3.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.62% | 6.38% | -3.76% |