PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LKEQX vs. FGKFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LKEQX vs. FGKFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LKCM Equity Fund (LKEQX) and Fidelity Growth Company K6 Fund (FGKFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LKEQX achieves a 5.00% return, which is significantly lower than FGKFX's 15.92% return.


LKEQX

1D
1.05%
1M
-0.10%
6M
0.92%
YTD
5.00%
1Y
9.13%
3Y*
10.47%
5Y*
5.82%
10Y*
11.59%
ALL TIME*
8.93%

FGKFX

1D
3.03%
1M
-4.41%
6M
12.69%
YTD
15.92%
1Y
30.68%
3Y*
26.36%
5Y*
14.61%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
23.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

LKEQX vs. FGKFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
LKEQX
LKCM Equity Fund
5.00%10.39%14.37%12.65%-15.50%22.50%22.79%11.14%
FGKFX
Fidelity Growth Company K6 Fund
15.92%21.67%35.46%46.02%-32.62%22.06%68.76%15.07%

Correlation

The correlation between LKEQX and FGKFX is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2019

0.82

The correlation between LKEQX and FGKFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LKEQX vs. FGKFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LKEQX
LKEQX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
LKEQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LKEQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
LKEQX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
LKEQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
LKEQX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

FGKFX
FGKFX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
FGKFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGKFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGKFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
FGKFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGKFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LKEQX vs. FGKFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LKCM Equity Fund (LKEQX) and Fidelity Growth Company K6 Fund (FGKFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LKEQXFGKFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.24

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.77

2.51

-1.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.67

8.60

-5.93

LKEQX vs. FGKFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LKEQX Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is lower than the FGKFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LKEQX and FGKFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LKEQX vs. FGKFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LKEQX drawdown since its inception was -48.52%, which is greater than FGKFX's maximum drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LKEQX and FGKFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LKEQXFGKFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.52%

-40.14%

-8.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.94%

-11.40%

+2.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.59%

-27.38%

+6.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.63%

-40.14%

+17.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.11%

-7.20%

+5.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.77%

-9.87%

+3.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.56%

3.32%

-0.76%

Volatility

LKEQX vs. FGKFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for LKCM Equity Fund (LKEQX) is 3.14%, while Fidelity Growth Company K6 Fund (FGKFX) has a volatility of 6.46%. This indicates that LKEQX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FGKFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LKEQXFGKFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.14%

6.46%

-3.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.41%

16.18%

-6.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.31%

20.89%

-8.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.57%

24.49%

-8.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.69%

25.75%

-9.06%

LKEQX vs. FGKFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LKEQX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than FGKFX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

LKEQX vs. FGKFX - Dividend Comparison

LKEQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.89%, while FGKFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGKFX
Fidelity Growth Company K6 Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.10%0.18%2.64%0.93%0.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LKEQX
LKCM Equity Fund
7.89%8.28%6.82%1.46%5.50%6.83%5.60%4.44%7.75%4.87%6.61%2.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


LKEQX and FGKFX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FGKFX has higher volatility (6.46%) compared to LKEQX (3.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LKEQX dropped -48.52% vs FGKFX's -40.14%.

FGKFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LKEQX and FGKFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer