PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LKBLX vs. AYBLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LKBLX vs. AYBLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LK Balanced Fund (LKBLX) and Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund (AYBLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LKBLX achieves a 3.60% return, which is significantly lower than AYBLX's 14.22% return. Over the past 10 years, LKBLX has underperformed AYBLX with an annualized return of 7.47%, while AYBLX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.59% annualized return.


LKBLX

1D
0.10%
1M
-0.37%
YTD
3.60%
6M
3.00%
1Y
9.86%
3Y*
8.47%
5Y*
3.98%
10Y*
7.47%

AYBLX

1D
0.93%
1M
1.85%
YTD
14.22%
6M
14.00%
1Y
33.22%
3Y*
17.09%
5Y*
9.89%
10Y*
10.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LKBLX vs. AYBLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LKBLX
LK Balanced Fund
3.60%7.12%9.78%8.29%-5.58%12.30%5.12%20.39%-3.28%14.04%
AYBLX
Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund
14.22%19.80%9.64%15.41%-14.39%15.48%12.92%22.22%-4.43%15.19%

Correlation

The correlation between LKBLX and AYBLX is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2012

0.83

Over the past year, the correlation between LKBLX and AYBLX has dropped to 0.57 - well below their long-term average of 0.83, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LKBLX vs. AYBLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LKBLX
LKBLX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
LKBLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LKBLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
LKBLX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
LKBLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
LKBLX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

AYBLX
AYBLX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
AYBLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AYBLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
AYBLX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
AYBLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
AYBLX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LKBLX vs. AYBLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LK Balanced Fund (LKBLX) and Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund (AYBLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LKBLXAYBLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.61

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.38

5.12

-2.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.96

23.78

-17.82

LKBLX vs. AYBLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LKBLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is lower than the AYBLX Sharpe Ratio of 3.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LKBLX and AYBLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LKBLX vs. AYBLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LKBLX drawdown since its inception was -28.77%, smaller than the maximum AYBLX drawdown of -36.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LKBLX and AYBLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LKBLXAYBLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.77%

-36.28%

+7.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.20%

-6.41%

+2.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.30%

-13.39%

+1.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.46%

-20.26%

-1.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.77%

-24.24%

-4.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.65%

-0.32%

-2.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.77%

-3.78%

-0.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.67%

1.38%

+0.29%

Volatility

LKBLX vs. AYBLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for LK Balanced Fund (LKBLX) is 2.02%, while Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund (AYBLX) has a volatility of 3.74%. This indicates that LKBLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AYBLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LKBLXAYBLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.02%

3.74%

-1.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.37%

7.86%

-2.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.20%

9.94%

-1.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.90%

11.13%

+0.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.51%

11.33%

+1.18%

LKBLX vs. AYBLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LKBLX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than AYBLX's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

LKBLX vs. AYBLX - Dividend Comparison

LKBLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.77%, more than AYBLX's 3.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AYBLX
Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund
3.24%3.58%2.59%1.76%3.23%8.61%4.12%6.03%9.97%9.42%2.63%4.14%
LKBLX
LK Balanced Fund
11.77%12.20%8.93%6.68%3.90%1.96%6.01%3.14%7.14%2.13%1.58%3.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


LKBLX and AYBLX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AYBLX has higher volatility (3.74%) compared to LKBLX (2.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LKBLX dropped -28.77% vs AYBLX's -36.28%.

AYBLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.30 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LKBLX and AYBLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer