PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LKBLX vs. AVEFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LKBLX vs. AVEFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LK Balanced Fund (LKBLX) and Ave Maria Bond Fund (AVEFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LKBLX achieves a 3.60% return, which is significantly higher than AVEFX's 0.79% return. Over the past 10 years, LKBLX has outperformed AVEFX with an annualized return of 7.47%, while AVEFX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.78% annualized return.


LKBLX

1D
0.10%
1M
-0.37%
YTD
3.60%
6M
3.00%
1Y
9.86%
3Y*
8.47%
5Y*
3.98%
10Y*
7.47%

AVEFX

1D
-0.16%
1M
-0.58%
YTD
0.79%
6M
0.77%
1Y
3.51%
3Y*
5.44%
5Y*
2.92%
10Y*
3.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LKBLX vs. AVEFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LKBLX
LK Balanced Fund
3.60%7.12%9.78%8.29%-5.58%12.30%5.12%20.39%-3.28%14.04%
AVEFX
Ave Maria Bond Fund
0.79%5.63%5.71%5.16%-2.84%4.38%5.60%8.30%0.41%4.16%

Correlation

The correlation between LKBLX and AVEFX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2012

0.73

The correlation between LKBLX and AVEFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LKBLX vs. AVEFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LKBLX
LKBLX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
LKBLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LKBLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
LKBLX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
LKBLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
LKBLX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

AVEFX
AVEFX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
AVEFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVEFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVEFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
AVEFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVEFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LKBLX vs. AVEFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LK Balanced Fund (LKBLX) and Ave Maria Bond Fund (AVEFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LKBLXAVEFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.22

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.38

1.34

+1.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.96

3.45

+2.50

LKBLX vs. AVEFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LKBLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is comparable to the AVEFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LKBLX and AVEFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LKBLX vs. AVEFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LKBLX drawdown since its inception was -28.77%, which is greater than AVEFX's maximum drawdown of -10.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LKBLX and AVEFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LKBLXAVEFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.77%

-10.24%

-18.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.20%

-2.75%

-1.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.30%

-2.82%

-9.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.46%

-7.57%

-13.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.77%

-10.24%

-18.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.65%

-2.75%

+0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.77%

-0.97%

-3.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.67%

1.07%

+0.60%

Volatility

LKBLX vs. AVEFX - Volatility Comparison

LK Balanced Fund (LKBLX) has a higher volatility of 2.02% compared to Ave Maria Bond Fund (AVEFX) at 0.95%. This indicates that LKBLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVEFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LKBLXAVEFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.02%

0.95%

+1.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.37%

2.30%

+3.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.20%

2.99%

+5.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.90%

4.14%

+7.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.51%

4.02%

+8.49%

LKBLX vs. AVEFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LKBLX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than AVEFX's 0.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

LKBLX vs. AVEFX - Dividend Comparison

LKBLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.77%, more than AVEFX's 3.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVEFX
Ave Maria Bond Fund
3.49%3.51%2.94%2.47%3.59%2.32%2.43%3.31%3.21%2.04%2.94%1.89%
LKBLX
LK Balanced Fund
11.77%12.20%8.93%6.68%3.90%1.96%6.01%3.14%7.14%2.13%1.58%3.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


LKBLX and AVEFX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LKBLX has higher volatility (2.02%) compared to AVEFX (0.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LKBLX dropped -28.77% vs AVEFX's -10.24%.

AVEFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LKBLX and AVEFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer