PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LKBAX vs. AQEIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LKBAX vs. AQEIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LKCM Balanced Fund (LKBAX) and LKCM Aquinas Catholic Equity Fund (AQEIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LKBAX achieves a 2.48% return, which is significantly lower than AQEIX's 3.05% return. Over the past 10 years, LKBAX has underperformed AQEIX with an annualized return of 8.15%, while AQEIX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.81% annualized return.


LKBAX

1D
-0.14%
1M
1.05%
YTD
2.48%
6M
2.77%
1Y
8.58%
3Y*
9.81%
5Y*
4.77%
10Y*
8.15%

AQEIX

1D
-0.60%
1M
0.61%
YTD
3.05%
6M
1.81%
1Y
9.35%
3Y*
10.69%
5Y*
5.41%
10Y*
10.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LKBAX vs. AQEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LKBAX
LKCM Balanced Fund
2.48%8.44%10.97%10.85%-13.86%14.01%15.28%21.86%-2.15%12.88%
AQEIX
LKCM Aquinas Catholic Equity Fund
3.05%6.72%13.29%14.08%-18.24%25.35%24.23%30.51%-8.03%20.80%

Correlation

The correlation between LKBAX and AQEIX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 1997

0.93

The correlation between LKBAX and AQEIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LKBAX vs. AQEIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LKBAX
LKBAX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
LKBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LKBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
LKBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
LKBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
LKBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

AQEIX
AQEIX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
AQEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AQEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
AQEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
AQEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
AQEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LKBAX vs. AQEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LKCM Balanced Fund (LKBAX) and LKCM Aquinas Catholic Equity Fund (AQEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LKBAXAQEIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.16

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.57

1.47

+0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.32

5.32

+1.00

LKBAX vs. AQEIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LKBAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is higher than the AQEIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LKBAX and AQEIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LKBAXAQEIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.29

0.93

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

0.33

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

0.60

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.40

+0.17

Drawdowns

LKBAX vs. AQEIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LKBAX drawdown since its inception was -31.40%, smaller than the maximum AQEIX drawdown of -54.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LKBAX and AQEIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LKBAXAQEIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.40%

-54.20%

+22.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.71%

-7.02%

+1.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.65%

-19.25%

+7.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.63%

-24.51%

+4.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.04%

-33.65%

+7.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

-0.60%

+0.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.28%

-8.70%

+4.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.42%

1.94%

-0.52%

Volatility

LKBAX vs. AQEIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for LKCM Balanced Fund (LKBAX) is 1.61%, while LKCM Aquinas Catholic Equity Fund (AQEIX) has a volatility of 2.95%. This indicates that LKBAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AQEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LKBAXAQEIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.61%

2.95%

-1.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.22%

7.94%

-2.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.97%

11.08%

-4.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.84%

16.56%

-5.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.89%

18.15%

-6.26%

LKBAX vs. AQEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LKBAX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than AQEIX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

LKBAX vs. AQEIX - Dividend Comparison

LKBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.87%, more than AQEIX's 5.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AQEIX
LKCM Aquinas Catholic Equity Fund
5.80%5.98%7.90%2.63%6.05%12.61%6.73%10.98%23.36%8.24%7.92%7.69%
LKBAX
LKCM Balanced Fund
5.87%6.00%4.60%3.49%3.59%4.41%4.18%5.95%3.02%4.09%5.06%3.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, LKBAX and AQEIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

AQEIX has higher volatility (2.95%) compared to LKBAX (1.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LKBAX dropped -31.40% vs AQEIX's -54.20%.

LKBAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LKBAX and AQEIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer