LIZKX vs. FCQTX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

LIZKX (BlackRock LifePath Index 2060 Fund Class K) and FCQTX (American Funds 2065 Target Date Retirement Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, LIZKX returned 10.46%/yr vs 10.07%/yr for FCQTX. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. LIZKX charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for FCQTX.

Performance

LIZKX vs. FCQTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock LifePath Index 2060 Fund Class K (LIZKX) and American Funds 2065 Target Date Retirement Fund (FCQTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LIZKX achieves a 12.73% return, which is significantly higher than FCQTX's 10.90% return.

LIZKX

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: 4.59%
• YTD: 12.73%
• 6M: 14.07%
• 1Y: 29.96%
• 3Y*: 20.02%
• 5Y*: 10.46%
• 10Y*: —

FCQTX

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 4.68%
• YTD: 10.90%
• 6M: 12.11%
• 1Y: 26.80%
• 3Y*: 19.73%
• 5Y*: 10.07%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LIZKX vs. FCQTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
LIZKX BlackRock LifePath Index 2060 Fund Class K	12.73%	21.70%	14.01%	21.67%	-18.33%	18.79%	50.14%
FCQTX American Funds 2065 Target Date Retirement Fund	10.90%	20.74%	15.64%	21.56%	-19.63%	17.34%	47.06%

Correlation

The correlation between LIZKX and FCQTX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2020	0.97

The correlation between LIZKX and FCQTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LIZKX vs. FCQTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LIZKX

LIZKX Risk / Return Rank: 69
LIZKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
LIZKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
LIZKX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
LIZKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
LIZKX Martin Ratio Rank: 76

FCQTX

FCQTX Risk / Return Rank: 59
FCQTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
FCQTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
FCQTX Omega Ratio Rank: 58
FCQTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
FCQTX Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LIZKX vs. FCQTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock LifePath Index 2060 Fund Class K (LIZKX) and American Funds 2065 Target Date Retirement Fund (FCQTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LIZKX	FCQTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.44	2.30	+0.14
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.38	3.21	+0.17
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.42	+0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.23	2.80	+0.42
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	14.37	12.75	+1.62
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LIZKX vs. FCQTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LIZKX Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is comparable to the FCQTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LIZKX and FCQTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LIZKX	FCQTX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.44	2.30	+0.14
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66	0.69	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.73	1.12	-0.39

Drawdowns

LIZKX vs. FCQTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LIZKX drawdown since its inception was -34.39%, which is greater than FCQTX's maximum drawdown of -27.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIZKX and FCQTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LIZKX	FCQTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.39%	-27.34%	-7.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.50%	-9.83%	+0.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.24%	-15.53%	-1.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.40%	-27.34%	+0.94%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.93%	-5.89%	+0.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.13%	2.16%	-0.03%

Volatility

LIZKX vs. FCQTX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock LifePath Index 2060 Fund Class K (LIZKX) has a higher volatility of 3.87% compared to American Funds 2065 Target Date Retirement Fund (FCQTX) at 3.54%. This indicates that LIZKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCQTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LIZKX	FCQTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.87%	3.54%	+0.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.19%	9.67%	+0.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.69%	12.05%	+0.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.88%	14.72%	+1.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.95%	15.06%	+1.89%

LIZKX vs. FCQTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LIZKX has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than FCQTX's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

LIZKX vs. FCQTX - Dividend Comparison

LIZKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, less than FCQTX's 4.21% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FCQTX American Funds 2065 Target Date Retirement Fund	4.21%	4.67%	2.80%	1.99%	3.96%	1.54%	0.72%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LIZKX BlackRock LifePath Index 2060 Fund Class K	1.95%	2.20%	0.00%	2.06%	1.86%	2.01%	1.57%	2.53%	2.27%	2.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LIZKX and FCQTX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, LIZKX and FCQTX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, LIZKX or FCQTX?

LIZKX has higher volatility (3.87%) compared to FCQTX (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIZKX dropped -34.39% vs FCQTX's -27.34%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LIZKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.